Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical Management of Carotid Body Tumors: Experience of Two Centers.
Pouhin, Alexandre; Die Loucou, Julien; Malikov, Sergueï; Gallet, Patrice; Anxionnat, Rene; Jazayeri, Aline; Steinmetz, Eric; Settembre, Nicla.
Afiliación
  • Pouhin A; Department of Vascular Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France. Electronic address: alexandre_pouhin@hotmail.com.
  • Die Loucou J; Department of Vascular Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
  • Malikov S; Department of Vascular Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
  • Gallet P; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
  • Anxionnat R; Department of Radiology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
  • Jazayeri A; Department of Vascular Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
  • Steinmetz E; Department of Vascular Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
  • Settembre N; Department of Vascular Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 98: 1-6, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839653
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare but require surgical resection given their potential for growth and malignancy. For some surgical teams, tumor hypervascularity justifies preoperative embolization to facilitate resection and limit complications. The objective of our study was to evaluate 2 different practices of surgical resection with or without preoperative embolization in a 2-center cohort.

METHODS:

A consecutive series of patients who underwent CBT surgery, from January 2011 to June 2019, were divided into 2 groups, as to whether they were (embolized CBT [ECBT]) or not (nonembolized CBT [NECBT]) preoperatively embolized. Both groups were compared specifically according to the duration of operation, postoperative complications, and length of stay.

RESULTS:

Twenty-two patients with a mean age of 48.5 ± 14.3 years were included. In the series, 23 CBTs were resected 13 were embolized preoperatively; the mean time between embolization and surgery was 2.62 ± 1.50 days. Both groups were comparable based on characteristics of population and tumor, with a mean size of 33.2 ± 11.9 mm. We noted a significant increase in operation duration in the ECBT group 151 min (±40.9) vs. 87.0 min (±21); P < 0.01. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding cranial nerve (50% vs. 46%; P = 1), sympathetic nervous system (20% vs. 23%; P = 1), or vascular nerve (20% vs. 23%; P = 0.18) complications. No cerebrovascular accident was identified. The length of stay was 3.60 days (±1.78) vs. 3.73 days (±1.19; P = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study reflects the experience of 2 centers in the management of CBT which is a rare pathology with no standardized treatment. Our series showed no significant difference between the ECBT and NECBT groups regarding postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The reduction in operating time in the NECBT group remains to be demonstrated.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tumor del Cuerpo Carotídeo / Embolización Terapéutica Límite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tumor del Cuerpo Carotídeo / Embolización Terapéutica Límite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article