Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce respiratory effects of cotton dust exposure among textile workers: the MultiTex RCT study.
Nafees, Asaad Ahmed; Allana, Asad; Kadir, Muhammad Masood; Potts, James; Minelli, Cosetta; Semple, Sean; De Matteis, Sara; Burney, Peter; Cullinan, Paul.
Afiliación
  • Nafees AA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan asaad.nafees@aku.edu.
  • Allana A; Genomic and Environmental Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Kadir MM; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Potts J; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Minelli C; Genomic and Environmental Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Semple S; Genomic and Environmental Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • De Matteis S; Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Burney P; Genomic and Environmental Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Cullinan P; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Eur Respir J ; 63(1)2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857425
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We determined the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce cotton dust-related respiratory symptoms and improve lung function of textile workers.

METHODS:

We undertook a cluster randomised controlled trial at 38 textile mills in Karachi, Pakistan. The intervention comprised training in occupational health for workers and managers, formation of workplace committees to promote a health and safety plan that included wet mopping and safe disposal of cotton dust, provision of simple face masks, and further publicity about the risks from cotton dust. Participating mills were randomised following baseline data collection. The impact of the intervention was measured through surveys at 3, 12 and 18 months using questionnaires, spirometry and dust measurements. The primary outcomes were 1) changes in prevalence of a composite respiratory symptom variable, 2) changes in post-bronchodilator percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and 3) changes in cotton dust levels. These were assessed using two-level mixed effects linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Of 2031 participants recruited at baseline, 807 (40%) were available at the third follow-up. At that point, workers in the intervention arm were more likely to report an improvement in respiratory symptoms (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06-2.36) and lung function (FEV1 % pred ß 1.31%, 95% CI 0.04-2.57%). Personal dust levels decreased, more so in intervention mills, although we did not observe this in adjusted models due to the small number of samples.

CONCLUSION:

We found the intervention to be effective in improving the respiratory health of textile workers and recommend scaling-up of such simple and feasible interventions in low- and middle-income countries.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Exposición Profesional / Enfermedades Pulmonares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Exposición Profesional / Enfermedades Pulmonares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán