Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Intraoperative Guidance During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Li, Allen; Javidan, Arshia P; Namazi, Babak; Madani, Amin; Forbes, Thomas L.
Afiliación
  • Li A; Faculty of Medicine & The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Javidan AP; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Namazi B; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Madani A; Department of Surgery, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Surgical Artificial Intelligence Research Academy, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Forbes TL; Department of Surgery, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: thomas.forbes@uhn.ca.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 99: 96-104, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914075
BACKGROUND: Adverse events during surgery can occur in part due to errors in visual perception and judgment. Deep learning is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that has shown promise in providing real-time intraoperative guidance. This study aims to train and test the performance of a deep learning model that can identify inappropriate landing zones during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A deep learning model was trained to identify a "No-Go" landing zone during EVAR, defined by coverage of the lowest renal artery by the stent graft. Fluoroscopic images from elective EVAR procedures performed at a single institution and from open-access sources were selected. Annotations of the "No-Go" zone were performed by trained annotators. A 10-fold cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the performance of the model against human annotations. Primary outcomes were intersection-over-union (IoU) and F1 score and secondary outcomes were pixel-wise accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The AI model was trained using 369 images procured from 110 different patients/videos, including 18 patients/videos (44 images) from open-access sources. For the primary outcomes, IoU and F1 were 0.43 (standard deviation ± 0.29) and 0.53 (±0.32), respectively. For the secondary outcomes, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 0.97 (±0.002), 0.51 (±0.34), 0.99 (±0.001). 0.99 (±0.002), and 0.62 (±0.34), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AI can effectively identify suboptimal areas of stent deployment during EVAR. Further directions include validating the model on datasets from other institutions and assessing its ability to predict optimal stent graft placement and clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Implantación de Prótesis Vascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Implantación de Prótesis Vascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá