Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review.
Huang, Yinan; Li, Jieni; Li, Mai; Aparasu, Rajender R.
Afiliación
  • Huang Y; Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, USA.
  • Li J; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
  • Li M; Department of Industrial Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Aparasu RR; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. rraparasu@uh.edu.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 23(1): 268, 2023 11 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37957593
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare.

METHODS:

PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC).

RESULTS:

Of 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6-0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Res Methodol Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Res Methodol Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos