Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Invoking Identity? Partisan Polarization in Discussions of Race, Racism, and Gender in 2022 Midterm Advertising in the U.S.
Fowler, Erika Franklin; Moore, Steven T; Floyd, Breeze; Yao, Jielu; Neumann, Markus; Lewis, Neil; Niederdeppe, Jeff; Gollust, Sarah E.
Afiliación
  • Fowler EF; Wesleyan University.
  • Moore ST; Wesleyan University.
  • Floyd B; Wesleyan University.
  • Yao J; Wesleyan University.
  • Neumann M; Duke Kunshan University.
  • Lewis N; Cornell University.
  • Niederdeppe J; Cornell University.
  • Gollust SE; University of Minnesota.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987197
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Media messaging matters for public opinion and policy, and analyzing patterns of campaign strategy can provide important windows into policy priorities.

METHODS:

We used content analysis supplemented with keyword-based text analysis to assess the volume, proportion and distribution of attention to race-related issues in comparison to gender-related issues during the general election period of the 2022 midterm campaigns for federal office.

FINDINGS:

Race-related mentions were overwhelmingly focused on crime and law and order with very little attention to racism, racial injustice, and the structural barriers that lead to widespread inequities. In stark contrast to mentions of gender, racial appeals were less identity focused and were competitively contested between the parties in their messaging, but much more likely to be led by Republicans.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that discussion of race and gender were highly polarized with consequences for public understanding of and belief in disparities and policies important to population health.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Health Polit Policy Law Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Health Polit Policy Law Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article