Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value of q waves in lateral and left precordial leads in patients with left bundle branch block to predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Zhang, Shimeng; Zhang, Hengli; Gu, Kai; Li, Mingfang; Liu, Hailei; Wang, Cheng; Chen, Minglong.
Afiliación
  • Zhang S; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Zhang H; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Gu K; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Li M; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Liu H; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wang C; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Chen M; Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 47(2): 177-184, 2024 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032023
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-response rate can reach 30% in heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). This study aimed to evaluate the value of baseline q waves in leads I, V5, or V6 in predicting response to CRT in patients with HF and LBBB.

METHODS:

Patients with HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) and LBBB receiving CRT implantation were retrospectively enrolled. Baseline characteristics and electrocardiogram parameters, including lateral and left precordial q waves were evaluated. Non-response to CRT was defined as the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 5% at a 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 132 patients (mean age 63.0 ± 10.4 years, 94 [71.2%] male) were included. Among them, 32 patients with q waves in leads I, V5, or V6 were classified into the qLBBB (+) group, and the rest without q waves in these leads were defined as the qLBBB (-) group. The CRT non-response rate in the qLBBB (+) group was markedly higher than that in the qLBBB (-) group (68.8% vs. 33.3%, p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of baseline q waves in leads I, V5, or V6 remained significantly associated with a higher rate of CRT non-response in patients with HF and LBBB (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.5-15.0, p = .007).

CONCLUSION:

Any q wave in leads I, V5, or V6 was an independent predictive factor for CRT non-response in patients with HF and LBBB.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China