Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital consent in gynecology: an evaluation of patient experience.
Ellis, Laura Burney; Barcroft, Jennifer; St John, Edward; Loughran, Dafydd; Kyrgiou, Maria; Phelps, David.
Afiliación
  • Ellis LB; Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, IRDB, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. lauraellis@doctors.org.uk.
  • Barcroft J; Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, IRDB, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
  • St John E; Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
  • Loughran D; University of Portsmouth, University House, Winston Churchill Ave, Portsmouth, PO1 2UP, UK.
  • Kyrgiou M; Concentric Health, Tramshed Tech, Cardiff, CF11 6BH, UK.
  • Phelps D; Concentric Health, Tramshed Tech, Cardiff, CF11 6BH, UK.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(2): 611-619, 2024 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063894
INTRODUCTION: The surgical consent process is a crucial discussion between patient and surgeon, which is predominantly documented utilizing hand-written forms. The exchange of individualized information allows the patient to make a truly informed decision. Digital consent (also known as electronic consent or e-consent) has been shown to improve accuracy of information provided without increasing the time taken to consent patients. We aimed to evaluate patient experience and effectiveness of digital consent in a gynecology department in a tertiary London Teaching Hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed and completed by 100 patients undergoing gynecological surgery: 50 consented using paper and 50 consented digitally. The questionnaire included 8 statements, with five possible answers to select, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree, on a standard five-point Likert Scale. Patients were all female and categorized into age groups (deciles) and asked whether consent was taken digitally or on paper. Data were collected between January and July 2021. RESULTS: Most responses were positive with 87% (694/800) of responses to the questions being either strongly agree or agree. Patients who were consented using paper selected 'strongly agree' 43.5% (174/400) of the time in comparison to 64.8% (259/400) of the time when they were consented digitally. The majority, 86% (43/50), of digitally consented patients received a copy of the consent form in comparison to 18% (9/50) of those consented using paper. On average, the patients consented digitally were older than their paper-consented counterparts (49-58 and 59-68 respectively). The mean scores for the questions relating to the ease of reading the form, ease of understanding the form, understanding of the potential complications, and overall satisfaction were higher in those digitally consented (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Overall, patients were satisfied with both methods of consent. However, individuals who were consented digitally reported higher levels of satisfaction throughout the consent process, compared to paper consent. These data suggest that digital consent is an acceptable alternative to paper consent for patients and facilitates adherence to national consent guidance, which stipulates patients should be given the information they request.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ginecología Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ginecología Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article