Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cabozantinib in the Routine Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence.
Gross-Goupil, Marine; Bodnar, Lubomir; Campbell, Matthew T; Michael, Agnieszka; Venugopal, Balaji; Zolnierek, Jakub; Dutailly, Pascale; Procopio, Giuseppe; Albiges, Laurence.
Afiliación
  • Gross-Goupil M; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux Saint André, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: marine.gross-goupil@chu-bordeaux.fr.
  • Bodnar L; University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Institute of Health Sciences, Siedlce, Poland.
  • Campbell MT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Michael A; University of Surrey, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Guildford, UK.
  • Venugopal B; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Zolnierek J; LuxMed Onkologia, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Dutailly P; Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Procopio G; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Albiges L; Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(1): 84-97, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101983
ABSTRACT
Real-world cabozantinib use has increased since its approval to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2016. We reviewed cabozantinib use in real-world clinical practice and compared outcomes with pivotal cabozantinib randomized control trials (RCTs). This PRISMA-standard systematic literature review evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with RCC (PROSPERO registration CRD42021245854). Systematic MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted on November 2, 2022. Eligible publications included ≥ 20 patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib. After double-screening for eligibility, standardized data were abstracted, qualitatively summarized, and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 353 screened publications, 41 were included, representing approximately 11,000 real-world patients. Most publications reported cabozantinib monotherapy cohort studies (40/41) of retrospective (39/41) and multicenter (32/41) design; most included patients from North America and/or Europe (30/41). Baseline characteristics were demographically similar between real-world and pivotal RCT populations, but real-world populations showed greater variation in prevalence of prior nephrectomy, multiple-site/brain metastasis, and nonclear-cell RCC histology. Cabozantinib activity was reported across real-world treatment lines and tumor types. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate values from pivotal RCTs were within the ranges reported for equivalent outcomes across real-world studies. Common real-world grade ≥ 3 adverse events were consistent with those in pivotal RCTs (fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension), but less frequent. No new tolerability concerns were identified. Real-world RCC survival outcomes for cabozantinib monotherapy were broadly consistent with pivotal RCTs, despite greater heterogeneity in real-world populations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridinas / Carcinoma de Células Renales / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Neoplasias Renales / Anilidas Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridinas / Carcinoma de Células Renales / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Neoplasias Renales / Anilidas Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article