Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rajjoub, Rami; Ghaith, Abdul Karim; El-Hajj, Victor Gabriel; Rios-Zermano, Jorge; De Biase, Gaetano; Atallah, Elias; Tfaily, Ali; Saad, Hassan; Akinduro, Oluwaseun O; Elmi-Terander, Adrian; Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley.
Afiliación
  • Rajjoub R; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Ghaith AK; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • El-Hajj VG; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Rios-Zermano J; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • De Biase G; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Atallah E; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Tfaily A; Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Saad H; Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Akinduro OO; Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Elmi-Terander A; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Abode-Iyamah K; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur Spine J ; 33(3): 985-1000, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110776
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Awake surgery, under spinal anesthesia (SA), is an alternative to surgery under general anesthesia (GA), in neurological and spine surgery. In the literature, there seem to be some evidence supporting benefits associated with the use of this anesthetic modality, as compared to GA. Currently, there is a notable lack of updated and comprehensive review addressing the complications associated with both awake SA and GA in spine surgery. We hence aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the topic.

METHODS:

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that assessed SA in spine surgery from database inception to April 14, 2023, in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and overall complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS:

In total, 38 studies that assessed 7820 patients were included. The majority of the operations that were treated with SA were single-level lumbar cases. Awake patients had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay (Mean difference (MD) - 0.40 days; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.17) and operative time (MD - 19.17 min; 95% CI - 29.68 to - 8.65) compared to patients under GA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients under GA than SA (RR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]). Patients under GA had significantly higher rates of postoperative nausea/vomiting RR, 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.90]) and urinary retention (RR, 0.61 [95% CI 0.37-0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients undergoing awake spine surgery under SA had significantly shorter operations and hospital stays, and fewer rates of postoperative nausea and urinary retention as compared to GA. In summary, awake spine surgery offers a valid alternative to GA and added benefits in terms of postsurgical complications, while being associated with relatively low morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestesia General / Anestesia Raquidea Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestesia General / Anestesia Raquidea Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos