Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-and long-term outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage gastrectomy for perforated gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched study.
Zhang, Junling; Li, Kexuan; Zhang, Zongnai; Zhang, Guochao; Zhang, Shupeng; Zhao, Yinming; Gao, Zhaoya; Ma, Haiyun; Xie, Yong; Han, Jinsheng; Zhang, Li; Zhang, Baoliang; Liu, Yang; Wu, Tao; Wu, Yingchao; Xiao, Yi; Wang, Xin.
Afiliación
  • Zhang J; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China.
  • Li K; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P. R. China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of General Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital, No.1A, Gaojing, Chaoyangmenwai Avenue, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100123, P. R. China.
  • Zhang G; Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, East Yinghuayuan Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, P. R. China.
  • Zhang S; Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, No.41 Zhejiang Road, Binhai New Area, Tianjin, 300450, P. R. China.
  • Zhao Y; Department of General Surgery, Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital, No.18, Heishan Street, Mentougou District, Beijing, 102399, P. R. China.
  • Gao Z; Department of General Surgery, Peking University Shougang Hospital, No.9, Jinyuanzhuang Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, P. R. China.
  • Ma H; Department of General Surgery, Beijing Miyun District Hospital, Miyun District, No.36 Mixi Road, Beijing, 101500, P. R. China.
  • Xie Y; Department of General Surgery, Hebei General Hospital, No.348 Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050051, P. R. China.
  • Han J; Department of General Surgery, Cangzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, No.31 Huanghe West Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, 061011, P. R. China.
  • Zhang L; Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, No. 258 Wenhua Road, Haigang District, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, 066000, P. R. China.
  • Zhang B; Department of General Surgery, Tangshan Workers' Hospital, No.27, Wenhua Road, Tangshan, Hebei Province, 063003, P. R. China.
  • Liu Y; Department of General Surgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, No.73 Jianshe South Road, Lubei District, Tangshan, Hebei Province, 063000, P. R. China.
  • Wu T; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China.
  • Wu Y; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China. wuyingchao8071@sina.com.
  • Xiao Y; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P. R. China. xiaoy@pumch.cn.
  • Wang X; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China. wangxin_guo@126.com.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 7, 2024 Jan 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172888
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

There is no scientific consensus about the treatment of perforated gastric cancer (PGC). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate which is the better treatment option for PGC between the single-stage and two-stage strategies.

METHODS:

All 81 PGC patients from 13 medical institutions were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The PGC patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy were divided into one-stage surgery and two-stage surgery groups. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups were compared, and 415 regular gastric cancer patients without perforation were randomly selected as a control. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to find matched regular GC patients with similar clinicopathological parameters. The OS (overall survival) and the number harvested lymph nodes from PGC patients and regular GC patients were compared.

RESULTS:

Compared with PGC patients who underwent one-stage surgery, those who underwent two-stage surgery harvested significantly more lymph nodes [31(27, 38) vs 17 (12, 24), P < 0.001], required less blood transfusion [0 (0, 100) vs 200 (0, 800), P = 0.034], had a shorter ICU stay [0 (0, 1.5) vs 3 (0, 3), P = 0.009], and had a significantly better OS (Median OS 45 months vs 11 months, P = 0.007). Compared with propensity score-matched regular GC patients without perforation, PGC patients who underwent one-stage gastrectomy had a poorer quality of lymphadenectomy [17 (12, 24) vs 29 (21, 37), P < 0.001] and suffered a worse OS (Median OS 18 months vs 30 months, P = 0.024). Conversely, two-stage gastrectomy can achieve a comparable quality of lymphadenectomy (P = 0.506) and a similar OS (P = 0.096) compared to propensity score-matched regular GC patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

For PGC patients in poor condition, two-stage treatment is a better option when D2 radical gastrectomy cannot be achieved in emergency surgery, based on our findings that two-stage gastrectomy could provide PGC patients with a better quality of lymphadenectomy and a better OS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article