Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dose-Effect Relationship of Motor Nerve Inexcitability on Outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Kumar, Mritunjai; Tiwari, Ashutosh; Kumar, Shakti; Singh, Rajni.
Afiliación
  • Kumar M; Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Tiwari A; Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Kumar S; Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Singh R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol ; 26(6): 936-942, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38229619
ABSTRACT

Objective:

One or more inexcitable motor (IM) nerves are common during electrodiagnostic (EDx) study in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study assessed the dose-effect relationship of IM nerves on outcome in patients with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor and/or sensory axonal neuropathy (AMAN and AMSAN). Materials and

Methods:

Eighty-eight GBS patients admitted during May 2018-June 2023 underwent detailed clinical evaluation and EDx study. Admission and follow-up disability were assessed on a 0-10 Clinical Grading Scale (CGS). Outcome was recovery at 6 months, defined as good (CGS <3) and poor (CGS ≥3). Binary multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination was used to calculate independent predictors of outcome.

Results:

Proportion of patients with complete recovery decreased significantly with increasing numbers of IM nerves (P < 0.01). Seventy-six patients were followed for 6 months. Among patients with IM nerves (n = 28), complete recovery was similar between AIDP and axonal GBS (70% vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.40). However, in patients with recordable compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in all the motor nerves (n = 26), axonal GBS had significantly poor recovery compared to AIDP (75% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.01). Among patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg; n = 42), poor recovery was seen in 53.6% with IM nerves compared to 35.7% without (P = 0.28), while it was 37.5% versus 5.6% (P = 0.04), respectively, in those who did not receive IVIg (n = 34). However, only admission disability (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.97; P = 0.007) was found to be an independent predictor of outcome.

Conclusion:

Although increasing numbers of IM nerves were associated with poor outcome on univariate analysis, they did not predict 6 months' outcome independently. Outcome did not differ between axonal GBS and AIDP among those with IM nerves. IVIg improved outcome in patients with IM nerves.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India