Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of inflammation by whole-body MRI in young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Choida, Varvara; Bray, Timothy J P; van Vucht, Niels; Abbasi, Maaz Ali; Bainbridge, Alan; Parry, Thomas; Sen, Debajit; Mallett, Sue; Ciurtin, Coziana; Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
Afiliación
  • Choida V; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, University College London, London, UK.
  • Bray TJP; Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK.
  • van Vucht N; Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK.
  • Abbasi MA; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, University College London, London, UK.
  • Bainbridge A; Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Parry T; Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Sen D; Department of Imaging, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Mallett S; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, University College London, London, UK.
  • Ciurtin C; Department of Medical Physics, University College Hospitals Trust, London, UK.
  • Hall-Craggs MA; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, University College London, London, UK.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244609
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the frequency of joint inflammation detected by whole-body MRI (WBMRI) in young people (YP) with JIA and controls, and to determine the relationship between WBMRI-detected inflammation and clinical findings.

METHODS:

YP aged 14-24 years, with JIA (patients) or arthralgia without JIA (controls), recruited from one centre, underwent a WBMRI scan after formal clinical assessment. Consensus between at least two of the three independent radiologists was required to define inflammation and damage on WBMRI, according to predefined criteria. YP with JIA were deemed clinically active as per accepted definitions. The proportions of YP with positive WBMRI scans for joint inflammation (≥1 inflamed joint) as well as serum biomarkers were compared between active vs inactive JIA patients and controls.

RESULTS:

Forty-seven YP with JIA (25 active and 22 inactive patients) and 13 controls were included. WBMRI detected joint inflammation in 60% (28/47) patients with JIA vs 15% (2/13) controls (difference 44%, 95% CI 20%, 68%). More active than inactive JIA patients had WBMRI-detected inflammation [76% (19/25) vs 41% (9/22), difference 35% (95% CI 9%, 62%)], and this was associated with a specific biomarker signature. WBMRI identified inflammation in ≥ 1 clinically inactive joint in 23/47 (49%) patients (14/25 active vs 9/22 inactive JIA patients).

CONCLUSIONS:

WBMRI's validity in joint assessment was demonstrated by the higher frequency of inflammation in JIA patients vs controls, and in active vs inactive JIA patients. WBMRI found unsuspected joint inflammation in 49% YP with JIA, which needs further investigation of potential clinical implications.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido