Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ethical approval for controlled human infectious model clinical trial protocols - A workshop report.
Jamrozik, Euzebiusz; Littler, Katherine; Meln, Irina; Van Molle, Wim; Morel, Sandra; Olesen, Ole F; Rubbrecht, Michelle; Balasingam, Shobana; Neels, Pieter.
Afiliación
  • Jamrozik E; The Ethox Centre & Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Littler K; Health Ethics and Governance Unit, Research for Health Department, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Meln I; European Vaccine Initiative, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Van Molle W; Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Morel S; Glaxosmithkline (GSK), Rixensart, Belgium.
  • Olesen OF; European Vaccine Initiative, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rubbrecht M; P95 Epidemiology & Pharmacovigilance, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Balasingam S; Wellcome Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Neels P; International Alliance for Biological Standardization (IABS), Lyon, France. Electronic address: pieter.neels@vaccine-advice.be.
Biologicals ; 85: 101748, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350349
ABSTRACT
Controlled Human Infectious Model studies (CHIM) involve deliberately exposing volunteers to pathogens. To discuss ethical issues related to CHIM, the European Vaccine Initiative and the International Alliance for Biological Standardization organised the workshop "Ethical Approval for CHIM Clinical Trial Protocols", which took place on May 30-31, 2023, in Brussels, Belgium. The event allowed CHIM researchers, regulators, ethics committee (EC) members, and ethicists to examine the ethical criteria for CHIM and the role(s) of CHIM in pharmaceutical development. The discussions led to several recommendations, including continued assurance that routine ethical requirements are met, assurance that participants are well-informed, and that preparation of study documents must be both ethically and scientifically sound from an early stage. Study applications must clearly state the rationale for the challenge compared to alternative study designs. ECs need to have clear guidance and procedures for evaluating social value and assessing third-party risks. Among other things, public trust in research requires minimisation of harm to healthy volunteers and third-party risk. Other important considerations include appropriate stakeholder engagement, public education, and access to health care for participants after the study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Desarrollo de Medicamentos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biologicals Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Desarrollo de Medicamentos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biologicals Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido