Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards clinical implementation of an AI-algorithm for detection of cervical spine fractures on computed tomography.
Ruitenbeek, Huibert C; Oei, Edwin H G; Schmahl, Bart L; Bos, Eelke M; Verdonschot, Rob J C G; Visser, Jacob J.
Afiliación
  • Ruitenbeek HC; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Oei EHG; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Schmahl BL; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bos EM; Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Verdonschot RJCG; Emergency Department, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Visser JJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.visser@erasmusmc.nl.
Eur J Radiol ; 173: 111375, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377894
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications can facilitate detection of cervical spine fractures on CT and reduce time to diagnosis by prioritizing suspected cases.

PURPOSE:

To assess the effect on time to diagnose cervical spine fractures on CT and diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available AI application. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this study (June 2020 - March 2022) with historic controls and prospective evaluation, we evaluated regulatory-cleared AI-software to prioritize cervical spine fractures on CT. All patients underwent non-contrast CT of the cervical spine. The time between CT acquisition and the moment the scan was first opened (DNT) was compared between the retrospective and prospective cohorts. The reference standard for determining diagnostic accuracy was the radiology report created in routine clinical workflow and adjusted by a senior radiologist. Discrepant cases were reviewed and clinical relevance of missed fractures was determined.

RESULTS:

2973 (mean age, 55.4 ± 19.7 [standard deviation]; 1857 men) patients were analyzed by AI, including 2036 retrospective and 938 prospective cases. Overall prevalence of cervical spine fractures was 7.6 %. The DNT was 18 % (5 min) shorter in the prospective cohort. In scans positive for cervical spine fracture according to the reference standard, DNT was 46 % (16 min) shorter in the prospective cohort. Overall sensitivity of the AI application was 89.8 % (95 % CI 84.2-94.0 %), specificity was 95.3 % (95 % CI 94.2-96.2 %), and diagnostic accuracy was 94.8 % (95 % CI 93.8-95.8 %). Negative predictive value was 99.1 % (95 % CI 98.5-99.4 %) and positive predictive value was 63.0 % (95 % CI 58.0-67.8 %). 22 fractures were missed by AI of which 5 required stabilizing therapy.

CONCLUSION:

A time gain of 16 min to diagnosis for fractured cases was observed after introducing AI. Although AI-assisted workflow prioritization of cervical spine fractures on CT shows high diagnostic accuracy, clinically relevant cases were missed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Óseas Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol / Eur. j. radiol / European journal of radiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Óseas Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol / Eur. j. radiol / European journal of radiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos