Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Polygenic Scores Clarify the Relationship Between Mental Health and Gender Diversity.
Thomas, Taylor R; Tener, Ashton J; Pearlman, Amy M; Imborek, Katherine L; Yang, Ji Seung; Strang, John F; Michaelson, Jacob J.
Afiliación
  • Thomas TR; Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Tener AJ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Pearlman AM; Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Imborek KL; Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Yang JS; Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
  • Strang JF; Gender and Autism Program, Center for Neuroscience, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Michaelson JJ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci ; 4(2): 100291, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38425476
ABSTRACT

Background:

Gender-diverse individuals are at increased risk for mental health problems, but it is unclear whether this is due to shared environmental or genetic factors.

Methods:

In two SPARK samples, we tested for associations of 16 polygenic scores (PGSs) with quantitative measures of gender diversity and mental health. In study 1, 639 independent adults (59% autistic) reported their mental health with the Adult Self-Report and their gender diversity with the Gender Self-Report (GSR). The GSR has 2 dimensions binary (degree of identification with the gender opposite that implied by sex designated at birth) and nonbinary (degree of identification with a gender that is neither male nor female). In study 2 (N = 5165), we used a categorical measure of gender identity.

Results:

In study 1, neuropsychiatric PGSs were positively associated with Adult Self-Report scores externalizing was positively associated with the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder PGS (ß = 0.10 [0.03-0.17]), and internalizing was positively associated with the PGSs for depression (ß = 0.07 [0-0.14]) and neuroticism (ß = 0.10 [0.03-0.17]). Interestingly, GSR scores were not significantly associated with any neuropsychiatric PGS. However, GSR nonbinary was positively associated with the cognitive performance PGS (ß = 0.11 [0.05-0.18]), with the effect size comparable in magnitude to the associations of the neuropsychiatric PGSs with the Adult Self-Report. Additionally, GSR binary was positively associated with the nonheterosexual sexual behavior PGS (ß = 0.07 [0-0.14]). In study 2, the cognitive performance PGS effect replicated; transgender and nonbinary individuals had higher PGSs (t316 = 4.16).

Conclusions:

We showed that while gender diversity is phenotypically positively associated with mental health problems, the strongest PGS associations with gender diversity were with the cognitive performance PGS, not the neuropsychiatric PGSs.
This research explores the connection between gender diversity, mental health, and genetic factors. It reveals that gender-diverse individuals often experience more mental health issues. Interestingly, rather than finding evidence linking these mental health challenges to genetic risk factors, the study discovered a replicable positive correlation between gender diversity and genetic markers for higher cognitive performance. This suggests that gender-diverse individuals typically have more of these cognitive performance gene variants. Finally, the study presents some early evidence suggesting that interactions between the environment (e.g., stigma) and genetic risk explain some of the elevated risk to mental health in gender-diverse individuals.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article