Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic evaluation of germline genetic testing for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Goh, Sook Pin; Ong, Siew Chin; Chan, Jue Ern.
Afiliación
  • Goh SP; Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Ong SC; Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. siewchinong@usm.my.
  • Chan JE; Pharmacy Department, Klinik Kesihatan Chemor Pejabat Kesihatan Daerah Kinta, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 316, 2024 Mar 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454347
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer affecting women globally. Genetic testing serves as a prevention and treatment strategy for managing BC. This study aims to systematically review economic evaluations and the quality of selected studies involving genetic screening strategies for BC in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS:

A search was performed to identify related articles that were published up to April 2023 on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Only English-language LMIC studies were included. Synthesis of studies characteristics, methodological and data input variations, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and reporting quality (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist) were performed.

RESULTS:

This review found five pertinent studies, mainly focusing on economic evaluations of germline genetic testing in upper-middle-income countries (Upper MICs) like Malaysia, China, and Brazil. Only one study covered multiple countries with varying incomes, including lower-middle-income nations (Lower MICs) like India. The ICERs values in various screening scenarios for early-stage BC, HER2 negative BC patients, and healthy women with clinical or family history criteria were ranging from USD 2214/QALY to USD 36,342/QALY. Multigene testing for all breast cancer patients with cascade testing was at USD 7729/QALY compared to BRCA alone. Most studies adhered to the CHEERS 2022 criteria, signifying high methodological quality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Germline testing could be considered as cost-effective compared to no testing in Upper MICs (e.g., Malaysia, China, Brazil) but not in Lower MICs (e.g., India) based on the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold set by each respective study. Limitations prevent a definite conclusion about cost-effectiveness across LMICs. More high-quality studies are crucial for informed decision-making and improved healthcare practices in these regions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Países en Desarrollo Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Malasia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Países en Desarrollo Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Malasia