Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Outcomes in histopathologic subgroups from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial.
Schadendorf, Dirk; Luke, Jason John; Ascierto, Paolo A; Long, Georgina V; Rutkowski, Piotr; Khattak, Adnan; Del Vecchio, Michele; de la Cruz-Merino, Luis; Mackiewicz, Jacek; Sileni, Vanna Chiarion; Kirkwood, John M; Robert, Caroline; Grob, Jean-Jacques; Dummer, Reinhard; Carlino, Matteo S; Zhao, Yujie; Kalabis, Mizuho; Krepler, Clemens; Eggermont, Alexander; Scolyer, Richard A.
Afiliación
  • Schadendorf D; University Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, NCT-West, Essen Campus, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen & University Alliance Ruhr, One Health Research Centre, Essen, Germany dirk.schadendorf@uk-essen.de.
  • Luke JJ; Cancer Immunotherapeutics Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Ascierto PA; Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
  • Long GV; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rutkowski P; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Khattak A; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Del Vecchio M; Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • de la Cruz-Merino L; Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Mackiewicz J; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Sileni VC; Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Kirkwood JM; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Robert C; Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • Grob JJ; Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland.
  • Dummer R; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
  • Carlino MS; Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
  • Zhao Y; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kalabis M; Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
  • Krepler C; Aix Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
  • Eggermont A; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Scolyer RA; Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(3)2024 Mar 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485189
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) versus placebo in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study of resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. At the prespecified third interim analysis (data cut-off, January 4, 2022), the HR for RFS in the overall population was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84) and the HR for DMFS was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). We present a post hoc analysis of efficacy by subtypes defined by histopathologic characteristics.

METHODS:

Patients aged ≥12 years with newly diagnosed, resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma were randomly assigned (11) to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo. The primary end point was RFS per investigator review; DMFS per investigator review was secondary. Subgroups of interest were melanoma subtype (nodular vs non-nodular), tumor thickness (≤4 mm vs >4 mm), presence of ulceration (yes vs no), mitotic rate (<5 per mm2 (median) vs ≥5 per mm2), and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; absent vs present).

RESULTS:

Between September 23, 2018, and November 4, 2020, 976 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). Median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 14.0-39.4). The HR (95% CI) for RFS was 0.54 (0.37 to 0.79) for nodular and 0.77 (0.53 to 1.11) for non-nodular melanoma; 0.57 (0.37 to 0.89) for thickness ≤4 mm and 0.69 (0.50 to 0.96) for >4 mm; 0.66 (0.50 to 0.89) for ulceration and 0.57 (0.32 to 1.03) for no ulceration; 0.57 (0.35 to 0.92) for mitotic rate <5 per mm2 and 0.57 (0.40 to 0.80) for ≥5 per mm2; and 0.89 (0.52 to 1.54) for TILs absent and 0.51 (0.34 to 0.76) for TILs present. DMFS results were similar. In a Cox multivariate analysis, treatment arm, tumor thickness, and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for RFS, and treatment arm and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this post hoc analysis, the benefit of pembrolizumab was largely consistent with the overall study population regardless of histopathologic characteristics. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Melanoma Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Melanoma Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania