Comparison of peripheral blood automated hematopoietic progenitor cell count and flow cytometric CD34+ cell count.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stem cell apheresis in the context of autologous stem cell transplantation requires an accurate cluster of differentiantion 34 (CD34+) count determined by flow cytometry as the current gold standard. Since flow cytometry is a personnel and time-intensive diagnostic tool, automated stem cell enumeration may provide a promising alternative. Hence, this study aimed to compare automated hematopoietic progenitor enumeration carried out on a Sysmex XN-20 module compared with conventional flow cytometric measurements. METHODS: One hundred forty-three blood samples from 41 patients were included in this study. Correlation between the two methods was calculated over all samples, depending on leukocyte count and diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, we found a high degree of correlation (r = 0.884). Furthermore, correlation was not impaired by elevated leukocyte counts (>10 000/µL, r = 0.860 vs <10 000/µL, r = 0.849; >20 000/µL, r = 0.843 vs <20 000/µL, r = 0.875). However, correlation was significantly impaired in patients with multiple myeloma (multiple myeloma r = 0.840 vs nonmyeloma r = 0.934). SUMMARY: Stem cell measurement carried out on the Sysmex XN-20 module provides a significant correlation with flow cytometry and might be implemented in clinical practice. In clinical decision-making, there was discrepancy of under 15% of cases. In multiple myeloma patients, XN-20 should be used with caution.