Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The progress test as a structuring initiative for programmatic assessment.
Alavarce, Débora Cristina; de Medeiros, Melyssa Lima; de Araújo Viana, Danylo; Abade, Flávia; Vieira, Joaquim Edson; Machado, José Lúcio Martins; Collares, Carlos Fernando.
Afiliación
  • Alavarce DC; Inspirali Educação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • de Medeiros ML; Universidade Potiguar, Natal, RN, Brasil.
  • de Araújo Viana D; Universidade Potiguar, Natal, RN, Brasil.
  • Abade F; Inspirali Educação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Vieira JE; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. joaquimev@usp.br.
  • Machado JLM; Inspirali Educação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Collares CF; Inspirali Educação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 555, 2024 May 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773470
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Progress Test is an individual assessment applied to all students at the same time and on a regular basis. The test was structured in the medical undergraduate education of a conglomerate of schools to structure a programmatic assessment integrated into teaching. This paper presents the results of four serial applications of the progress test and the feedback method to students.

METHODS:

This assessment comprises 120 items offered online by means of a personal password. Items are authored by faculty, peer-reviewed, and approved by a committee of experts. The items are classified by five major areas, by topics used by the National Board of Medical Examiners and by medical specialties related to a national Unified Health System. The correction uses the Item Response Theory with analysis by the "Rasch" model that considers the difficulty of the item.

RESULTS:

Student participation increased along the four editions of the tests, considering the number of enrollments. The median performances increased in the comparisons among the sequential years in all tests, except for test1 - the first test offered to schools. Between subsequent years of education, 2nd-1st; 4th-3rd and 5th-4th there was an increase in median scores from progress tests 2 through 4. The final year of undergraduate showed a limited increase compared to the 5th year. There is a consistent increase in the median, although with fluctuations between the observed intervals.

CONCLUSION:

The progress test promoted the establishment of regular feedback among students, teachers and coordinators and paved the road to engagement much needed to construct an institutional programmatic assessment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación de Pregrado en Medicina / Evaluación Educacional Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ / BMC med. educ / BMC medical education Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación de Pregrado en Medicina / Evaluación Educacional Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ / BMC med. educ / BMC medical education Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil