Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential Outcomes of Placebo Treatment Across 9 Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bschor, Tom; Nagel, Lea; Unger, Josephine; Schwarzer, Guido; Baethge, Christopher.
Afiliación
  • Bschor T; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Nagel L; Government Commission for Modern and Needs-Based Hospital Care, Berlin, Germany.
  • Unger J; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Schwarzer G; Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Berlin, Germany.
  • Baethge C; Social Psychiatric Service, Berlin district of Reinickendorf, Berlin, Germany.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 81(8): 757-768, 2024 Aug 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809560
ABSTRACT
Importance Placebo is the only substance systematically evaluated across common psychiatric diagnoses, but comprehensive cross-diagnostic comparisons are lacking.

Objective:

To compare changes in placebo groups in recent high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders in adult patients. Data Sources MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched in March 2022 for the latest systematic reviews meeting predetermined high-quality criteria for 9 major psychiatric diagnoses. Study Selection Using these reviews, the top 10 highest-quality (ie, lowest risk of bias, according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) and most recent placebo-controlled RCTs per diagnosis (totaling 90 RCTs) were selected, adhering to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data Extraction and

Synthesis:

Following the Cochrane Handbook, 2 authors independently carried out the study search, selection, and data extraction. Cross-diagnosis comparisons were based on standardized pre-post effect sizes (mean change divided by its SD) for each placebo group. This study is reported following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Main Outcome and

Measure:

The primary outcome, pooled pre-post placebo effect sizes (dav) with 95% CIs per diagnosis, was determined using random-effects meta-analyses. A Q test assessed statistical significance of differences across diagnoses. Heterogeneity and small-study effects were evaluated as appropriate.

Results:

A total of 90 RCTs with 9985 placebo-treated participants were included. Symptom severity improved with placebo in all diagnoses. Pooled pre-post placebo effect sizes differed across diagnoses (Q = 88.5; df = 8; P < .001), with major depressive disorder (dav = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.56) and generalized anxiety disorder (dav = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41) exhibiting the largest dav. Panic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, social phobia, and mania showed dav between 0.68 and 0.92, followed by OCD (dav = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78) and schizophrenia (dav = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.76). Conclusion and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that symptom improvement with placebo treatment was substantial in all conditions but varied across the 9 included diagnoses. These findings may help in assessing the necessity and ethical justification of placebo controls, in evaluating treatment effects in uncontrolled studies, and in guiding patients in treatment decisions. These findings likely encompass the true placebo effect, natural disease course, and nonspecific effects.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Efecto Placebo / Trastornos Mentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Efecto Placebo / Trastornos Mentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania