Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robust AI-Driven Segmentation of Glioblastoma T1c and FLAIR MRI Series and the Low Variability of the MRIMath© Smart Manual Contouring Platform.
Barhoumi, Yassine; Fattah, Abdul Hamid; Bouaynaya, Nidhal; Moron, Fanny; Kim, Jinsuh; Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M; Chahine, Rouba A; Sotoudeh, Houman.
Afiliación
  • Barhoumi Y; MRIMath, 3473 Birchwood Lane, Birmingham, AL 35243, USA.
  • Fattah AH; MRIMath, 3473 Birchwood Lane, Birmingham, AL 35243, USA.
  • Bouaynaya N; Department of Electrical and Computer Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
  • Moron F; Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Kim J; Department of Radiology, Emory University, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
  • Fathallah-Shaykh HM; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Chahine RA; RTI International, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
  • Sotoudeh H; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(11)2024 May 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38893592
ABSTRACT
Patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) continue to face a dire prognosis. Developing accurate and efficient contouring methods is crucial, as they can significantly advance both clinical practice and research. This study evaluates the AI models developed by MRIMath© for GBM T1c and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images by comparing their contours to those of three neuro-radiologists using a smart manual contouring platform. The mean overall Sørensen-Dice Similarity Coefficient metric score (DSC) for the post-contrast T1 (T1c) AI was 95%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 93% to 96%, closely aligning with the radiologists' scores. For true positive T1c images, AI segmentation achieved a mean DSC of 81% compared to radiologists' ranging from 80% to 86%. Sensitivity and specificity for T1c AI were 91.6% and 97.5%, respectively. The FLAIR AI exhibited a mean DSC of 90% with a 95% CI interval of 87% to 92%, comparable to the radiologists' scores. It also achieved a mean DSC of 78% for true positive FLAIR slices versus radiologists' scores of 75% to 83% and recorded a median sensitivity and specificity of 92.1% and 96.1%, respectively. The T1C and FLAIR AI models produced mean Hausdorff distances (<5 mm), volume measurements, kappa scores, and Bland-Altman differences that align closely with those measured by radiologists. Moreover, the inter-user variability between radiologists using the smart manual contouring platform was under 5% for T1c and under 10% for FLAIR images. These results underscore the MRIMath© platform's low inter-user variability and the high accuracy of its T1c and FLAIR AI models.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos