Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.
Agronin, Jacob; Brown, Meredith; Calvelli, Hannah; Zhao, Huaqing; Rakita, Val; Toyoda, Yoshiya; Kashem, Mohammed Abul.
Afiliación
  • Agronin J; Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Jacob.Agronin@tuhs.temple.edu.
  • Brown M; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Calvelli H; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Zhao H; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Rakita V; Temple Heart and Vascular Institute, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Toyoda Y; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Kashem MA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Cardiol ; 226: 1-8, 2024 Sep 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972536
ABSTRACT
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) adopted new criteria for the heart allocation score on October 18, 2018 to reflect the changing trends of candidates' mortality while awaiting transplant. We examined the impact of these policy changes on rates of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and outcomes after transplant from a relatively newer UNOS database. The UNOS registry was used to identify first-time adult heart recipients with LVAD at listing or transplant who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016 and March 10, 2020. Survival data were collected through March 30, 2023. Those listed before October 18, 2018 but transplanted after were excluded. Patients were divided into before or after change groups. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. A p <0.05 was considered significant. We identified 4,387 heart recipients with LVAD in the before (n = 3,606) and after (n = 781) score change eras. The after group had a lower rate of LVAD implantation while listed than the before group (20.4% vs 34.9%, p <0.0001), and were more likely to be female (25.1% vs 20.2%, p = 0.002); in both groups, most recipients (62.8%) were white. There was significantly farther distance from the donor hospital to transplant center in the after group (264.4 NM vs 144.2 NM, p <0.0001) and decreased waitlist days (84.9 ± 105.1 vs 369.2 ± 459.5, p <0.0001). Recipients in the after group were more likely to use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.7% vs 0.5%, p <0.0001) and intravenous inotropes (19.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.0001) and receive a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased risk donor organ (37.9% vs 30.5%, p <0.0001). Survival at 3 years was comparable between the 2 groups. The allocation score change in 2018 yielded considerable changes in mechanical circulatory support device implantation strategy and outcomes. The rate of LVAD implantation decreased with increased utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Corazón Auxiliar / Listas de Espera / Trasplante de Corazón / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Corazón Auxiliar / Listas de Espera / Trasplante de Corazón / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article