Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Happens to Frailty in the First Year After Lung Transplantation?
Fuller, Louise Mary; Whitford, Helen M; Robinson, Rebecca; Cristiano, Yvie; Steward, Ranjana; Poulsen, Megan; Paul, Eldho; Snell, Greg.
Afiliación
  • Fuller LM; Physiotherapy Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Whitford HM; Respiratory Department, Lung Transplant, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Robinson R; Department of Physiotherapy, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cristiano Y; Respiratory Department, Lung Transplant, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Steward R; Physiotherapy Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Poulsen M; Respiratory Department, Lung Transplant, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Paul E; Physiotherapy Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Snell G; Physiotherapy Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15393, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023090
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, but the impact and subsequent frailty trajectory is unclear. This study aimed to investigate frailty over the first year after LTx.

METHOD:

Post-LTx recipients completed a thrice weekly 12-week directly supervised exercise rehabilitation program. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty. Primary outcome was 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured at pre-LTx, prerehabilitation, postrehabilitation, and 1 year post-LTx.

RESULTS:

106 of 139 recruited participants underwent LTx mean age 58 years, 48% male, 52% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean (± SD) frailty scores pre-LTx and 1 year post-LTx were 5.54 ± 2.4 and 3.28 ±1.5. Mean 6MWD improved significantly for all prerehabilitation 326 m (SD 116), versus postrehabilitation 523 m (SD 101) (p < 0.001) versus 1 year 512 m (SD 120) (p < 0.001). There were significant differences between an EFS > 7 (frail) and EFS ≤ 7 (not frail) for 6MWD, grip strength (GS), anxiety, and depression. Postrehabilitation, there were no significant differences in 6MWD, GS, anxiety, or depression while comparing EFS > 7 versus ≤ 7. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in depression but not 6MWD, GS, or anxiety between those EFS ≤ 7 and > 7 (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION:

Participants in a structured post-LTx rehabilitation program improved in functional exercise capacity (6MWD), GS, depression, and anxiety. For frail participants exercise capacity, depression, anxiety, and GS were well managed in rehabilitation with no significant differences between those who were not frail. Pre-LTx frailty may be reversible post-LTx and should not be an absolute contraindication to LTx.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Pulmón / Fragilidad Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant / Clin. transplant / Clinical transplantation Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Pulmón / Fragilidad Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant / Clin. transplant / Clinical transplantation Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia