Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of Surface Subsidence in Mining Areas Based on Ascending-Descending Orbits Small Baseline Subset InSAR and Neural Network Optimization Models.
Chang, Kangtai; Zhao, Zhifang; Zhou, Dingyi; Tian, Zhuyu; Wang, Chang.
Afiliación
  • Chang K; Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
  • Zhao Z; School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
  • Zhou D; Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of China-Laos-Bangladesh-Myanmar Natural Resources Remote Sensing Monitoring, Kunming 650500, China.
  • Tian Z; Research Center of Domestic High-Resolution Satellite Remote Sensing Geological Engineering, Kunming 650500, China.
  • Wang C; Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sanjiang Metallogeny and Resources Exploration and Utilization, Kunming 650051, China.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(15)2024 Jul 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39123815
ABSTRACT
Surface subsidence hazards in mining areas are common geological disasters involving issues such as vegetation degradation and ground collapse during the mining process, which also raise safety concerns. To address the accuracy issues of traditional prediction models and study methods for predicting subsidence in open-pit mining areas, this study first employed 91 scenes of Sentinel-1A ascending and descending orbits images to monitor long-term deformations of a phosphate mine in Anning City, Yunnan Province, southwestern China. It obtained annual average subsidence rates and cumulative surface deformation values for the study area. Subsequently, a two-dimensional deformation decomposition was conducted using a time-series registration interpolation method to determine the distribution of vertical and east-west deformations. Finally, three prediction models were employed Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), BPNN optimized by Genetic Algorithm (GA-BP), and BPNN optimized by Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm (ABC-BP). These models were used to forecast six selected time series points. The results indicate that the BPNN model had Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Errors (RMSE) within 7.6 mm, while the GA-BP model errors were within 3.5 mm, and the ABC-BP model errors were within 3.7 mm. Both optimized models demonstrated significantly improved accuracy and good predictive capabilities.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China