Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of fracture risk assessment in men with prostate cancer requiring long-term androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic scoping review using the i-PARIHS implementation framework.
Huang, Qizhi; Mitchell, Caroline; Theodoulou, Elisavet; Lee, Andrew C K; Brown, Janet.
Afiliación
  • Huang Q; Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. q.huang@sheffield.ac.uk.
  • Mitchell C; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
  • Theodoulou E; Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Lee ACK; Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Brown J; Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Aug 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141309
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) and is associated with increased risks of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Despite international guidelines to mitigate fracture risk, osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated due to poor implementation. This scoping review aims to synthesise knowledge surrounding the implementation of guidelines to inform health service interventions to reduce fracture risk in men with PCa-taking ADT (PCa-ADT).

METHOD:

Four databases and additional literature were searched for studies published between January 2000 and January 2023. Studies that provided evidence influencing guidelines implementation were included. The i-PARIHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) implementation framework was used to inform the narrative synthesis.

RESULTS:

Of the 1229 studies identified, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, an improvement in fracture risk assessment was observed across heterogeneous study designs and outcome measures. Six studies were from Canada. Two studies involved family physicians or a community healthcare programme. Two studies incorporated patient or specialist surveys. One utilised an implementation framework. Implementation barriers included the lack of knowledge for both patients and clinicians, time constraints, unsupportive organisational structures, and challenges in transferring patient care from specialists to primary care. Effective strategies included education, novel care pathways using a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating a healthy bone prescription tool into routine care, point-of-care interventions, and bespoke clinics.

CONCLUSION:

There is an unmet need to provide evidence-based bone healthcare in men with PCa receiving ADT. This study highlights barriers and strategies in the implementation of fracture risk assessment for PCa-ADT patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Primary care clinicians can play a significant role in the management of complications from long-term cancer treatment such as treatment-induced bone loss. Future studies should consult patients, families, specialists, and primary care clinicians in service re-design.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article