Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up in implant and orthodontic treatment for inclined adjacent teeth.
Yang, Yi; Zhou, Shun-Cheng; Ma, Yi-Hui; Wang, Xiang; Dong, Qing-Shan.
Afiliación
  • Yang Y; Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China.
  • Zhou SC; Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China.
  • Ma YH; Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China.
  • Dong QS; Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China. dentist417@163.com.
World J Clin Cases ; 12(24): 5542-5548, 2024 Aug 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39188610
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tooth defects can cause elongation of occlusal teeth, leading to insufficient repair space. The combination of dental implant restoration and orthodontic treatment of oblique adjacent teeth has a significant therapeutic effect.

AIM:

To explore clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up of implant and orthodontic treatment for patients with inclined adjacent teeth.

METHODS:

In total, 98 patients with oblique adjacent teeth were randomly assigned to implant restoration combined with orthodontic treatment (group A, n = 49) or to receive implant restoration alone (group B, n = 49). Changes in alveolar ridge bone density and apical bone density were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. Changes in chewing function and language function were compared between the two groups of patients. Follow-up lasted for 12 mo after repair to observe any adverse reactions in the oral cavity.

RESULTS:

The clinical effective rates of group A and group B were 97.96% and 85.71%, respectively, with group A having a higher clinical effective rate than group B. After treatment, the bone density of the alveolar ridge and apical bone in both groups decreased compared to before treatment, while the chewing and language functions improved. The changes in various indicators in group A were more significant. After treatment, the satisfaction rate of group A (97.96%) was higher than that of group B (79.59%). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A (2.04%) was lower than that in group B (24.49%).

CONCLUSION:

The amalgamation of implant restoration and orthodontic treatment for adjacent tilted teeth demonstrates notable clinical efficacy, diminishes alveolar bone resorption, and fosters patient functional rehabilitation while exhibiting negligible adverse reactions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China