Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ranking of chemical substances based on the Japanese Pollutant Release and Transfer Register using partial order theory and random linear extensions.
Lerche, Dorte; Matsuzaki, Sanae Y; Sørensen, Peter B; Carlsen, Lars; Nielsen, Ole John.
Afiliação
  • Lerche D; Institute of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, The H.C. Ørsted Institute, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. dbl@dmu.dk
Chemosphere ; 55(7): 1005-25, 2004 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15051370
ABSTRACT
In 1997 a Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) pilot project was initiated in Japan. In 1998 the project was expanded and in 1999 a law concerning the establishment of a national PRTR was adopted. Data on the emissions of chemical substances are therefore now being reported on a continuous base. In relation to the PRTR project data on toxicity have been collected. In order to make efficient use of the collected information on emission and toxicity it is useful to group or rank the chemical substances according to the impact on human health and the environment. It has recently been argued that partial order theory (POT) in combination with the use of linear extensions (LE) may be the most objective way to create a linear rank. The methodology has been further expanded to handle larger data sets by the use of random linear extensions (RLE). In this paper the Japanese PRTR data are ranked using the POT/RLE methodology. An average rank is established for chemical substances in the 1998 and 1999 PRTR in Japan. The top 10 chemical substances in the 1998 PRTR are dichlorvos, inorganic arsenic compounds, cobalt compounds, beryllium compounds, fenitrothion, disulfoton, parathion, diazinon, 4,4'-diamino-3,3'-dichlorodiphenylmethane and antimony compounds. The top 10 chemical substances from the 1999 PRTR are PCBs, lead compounds, fenitrothion, dichlorvos, disulfoton, inorganic arsenic compounds, chlorothalonil, thiobencarb, chromium and HCFC-141b. The descriptor having the highest influence on the ranking of the 1998 PRTR data is the production volume, which, however, is not given in the 1999 PRTR. Further, the disagreement between the ranking with the lack of toxicity data substituted with mean and maximum values, respectively, strongly indicates a general need for further toxicological investigations.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Ambientais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Ambientais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca