Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A single-center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti.
Mehrabi, Arianeb; Mood, Zhoobin A; Fonouni, Hamidreza; Kashfi, Arash; Hillebrand, Norbert; Müller, Sascha A; Encke, Jens; Büchler, Markus W; Schmidt, Jan.
Afiliação
  • Mehrabi A; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. arianeb_mehrabi@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Liver Transpl ; 15(5): 466-74, 2009 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19399735
ABSTRACT
Over the past 4 decades, the surgical techniques of liver transplantation (LTx) have permanently evolved and been modified. Among these, the modified piggyback (MPB) technique by Belghiti offers specific advantages. The objective of this study was to present our single-center experience with the MPB technique in 500 cases. Recipients' perioperative data were prospectively collected and evaluated. Postoperative and specific complications, stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit, and the mortality rate with cause of death were analyzed. Most recipients were classified as Child C (49.1%). For the patients who underwent LTx for the first time, alcoholic (23.9%) and viral (22.2%) cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (15.1%) were the prevalent indications. The overall median warm ischemia time, anastomosis duration, and operative time were 45, 108, and 320 minutes, respectively. The median intraoperative blood loss was 1500 mL. A venovenous bypass was never needed to maintain hemodynamic stability. Only in a few cases was temporary inferior vena cava clamping necessary. Most prominent surgical complications were hemorrhage, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Renal failure occurred in 6.2% of patients. The overall median stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit was 14 days. The mortality rates within 30 and 90 days were 6.3% and 13.3%, respectively. No technique-related death occurred. The MPB technique by Belghiti is a feasible and simple LTx technique. The caval flow is preserved during the anhepatic phase, and this minimizes the need for venovenous bypass or portocaval shunt. This technique requires only 1 caval anastomosis, which is easy to perform with a short anhepatic phase. To minimize the risk of outflow obstruction, attention should be paid by doing a wide cavocavostomy cranially to the donor inferior vena cava in a door-lock manner. This technique can be applied in almost all patients undergoing LTx for the first time and liver retransplantation as well.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Veia Cava Inferior / Transplante de Fígado / Hepatectomia / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Liver Transpl Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Veia Cava Inferior / Transplante de Fígado / Hepatectomia / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Liver Transpl Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha