Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main stenosis in high risk patients not suitable for bypass surgery.
Gómez-Hospital, Joan Antoni; Gomez-Lara, Josep; Rondan, Juan; Homs, Silvia; Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Iñigo; Ferreiro, Jose Luís; Roura, Gerard; Maristany, Jaume; Teruel, Luis; Carro, Amelia; Avanzas, Pablo; Jara, Paco; Esplugas, Enric; Moris, Cesar; Cequier, Angel.
Afiliação
  • Gómez-Hospital JA; Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 26587jgh@comb.cat
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 65(6): 530-7, 2012 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22521483
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES:

Percutaneous coronary intervention is recommended in patients with unprotected left main stenosis non suitable for coronary artery bypass graft. Long-term follow-up of those patients remains uncertain.

METHODS:

All patients with de novo unprotected left main stenosis treated with stent implantation were consecutively enrolled. Percutaneous coronary intervention was indicated according to the standards of care, taking into account clinical and anatomical conditions unfavorable for coronary artery bypass graft. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS:

Of 226 consecutive patients included, 202 (89.4%) were treated with drug-eluting stents. Mean age was 72.1 years, 41.1% had renal dysfunction, and mean Syntax score and EuroSCORE were 28.9 and 7.4, respectively. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in 99.6% and 92.9% of patients. At 3 years, the rates of major adverse cardiac events, death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were 36.2%, 25.2%, 8.4%, 8.0%, respectively. Target lesion revascularization was more frequently observed when ≥ 2 stents were implanted rather than a single stent (18.5% vs 5.8%, P=.03); and with bare metal stents rather than drug-eluting stents (13.0% vs 7.9%, P=.24). Definite stent thrombosis was observed in 2 patients (0.9%) and probable stent thrombosis in 7 (3.1%). Female sex, impaired left ventricular function, and use of bare metal stents were significantly related with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

High-risk patients with unprotected left main stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention presented with a high rate of major adverse cardiac events at long-term follow-up. Female sex, impaired left ventricular function, and use of bare metal stents were predictors of poor prognosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angioplastia Coronária com Balão / Estenose Coronária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angioplastia Coronária com Balão / Estenose Coronária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha