Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla versus histology.
Smith, Andrew C; Parrish, Todd B; Abbott, Rebecca; Hoggarth, Mark A; Mendoza, Karl; Chen, Yu Fen; Elliott, James M.
Afiliação
  • Smith AC; Northwestern University Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Muscle Nerve ; 50(2): 170-6, 2014 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24677256
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We evaluated muscle/fat fraction (MFF) accuracy and reliability measured with an MR imaging technique at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanner strengths, using biopsy as reference.

METHODS:

MRI was performed on muscle samples from pig and rabbit species (n = 8) at 1.5T and 3.0T. A chemical shift based 2-point Dixon method was used, collecting in-phase and out-of-phase data for fat/water of muscle samples. Values were compared with MFFs calculated from histology.

RESULTS:

No significant difference was found between 1.5T and 3.0T (P values = 0.41-0.96), or between histology and imaging (P = 0.83) for any muscle tested.

CONCLUSIONS:

RESULTS suggest that a 2-point Dixon fat/water separation MRI technique may provide reliable quantification of MFFs at varying field strengths across different animal species, and consistency was established with biopsy. The results set a foundation for larger scale investigation of quantifying muscle fat in neuromuscular disorders.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tecido Adiposo / Músculo Esquelético Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Muscle Nerve Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tecido Adiposo / Músculo Esquelético Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Muscle Nerve Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos