Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of slow and fast pranayama training on handgrip strength and endurance in healthy volunteers.
Thangavel, Dinesh; Gaur, Girwar Singh; Sharma, Vivek Kumar; Bhavanani, Ananda Balayogi; Rajajeyakumar, M; Syam, Sunder A.
Afiliação
  • Thangavel D; Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Vinayaka Mission's Medical College , Karaikal, India .
  • Gaur GS; Additional Professor, Department of Physiology, JIPMER , Puducherry, India .
  • Sharma VK; Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, JIPMER , Puducherry, India .
  • Bhavanani AB; Deputy Director, CYTER, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute , Puducherry, India .
  • Rajajeyakumar M; Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Centre , Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India .
  • Syam SA; Phd Scholar, Department of Physiology, JIPMER , Puducherry, India .
J Clin Diagn Res ; 8(5): BC01-3, 2014 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24995168
BACKGROUND: Pranayama has been assigned very important role in yogic system of exercises and is said to be much more important than yogasanas for keeping sound health. Also different pranayamas produce divergent physiological effects. AIM: To study the effect of 12 weeks training of slow and fast pranayama on handgrip strength and endurance in young, healthy volunteers of JIPMER population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Present study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, JIPMER in 2011-12 (1.06.11 to 1.04.12). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total of 91 volunteer subjects were randomised into slow pranayama (SPG) (n=29), fast pranayama (FPG) (n=32) and control groups (CG) (n=30). Supervised pranayama training (SPG - Nadisodhana, Pranav pranayama and Savitri pranayama; FPG - Kapalabhati, Bhastrika and Kukkuriya pranayama) was given for 30 minutes thrice a week for 12 weeks to both slow and fast pranayama groups by certified yoga trainer. Hand grip strength (HGS) and endurance (HGE) parameters were recorded using handgrip dynamometer (Rolex, India) at baseline and after 12 weeks of pranayama training. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Longitudinal changes in each group were compared by using Student's paired t-test. Delta changes in each group were analysed by ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: In SPG significant improvement occurred only in HGE parameter from 83.95±45.06 to 101.62±53.87 (seconds) (p<0.001) whereas in FPG, significant improvement was observed in HGS from 33.31±9.83 to 37.9±9.41 (Kilograms) (p=0.01) as well as in HGE from 92.78±41.37 to 116.56±58.54 (seconds) (p=0.004). Using Students unpaired t-test difference between the groups in HGS is found to be 1.17±5.485 in SPG and in FPG is 4.59±7.26 (p=0.39); HGE difference in SPG is 1.77±21.17 and in FPG is 2.38±43.27 (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Pranayama training decreases sympathetic activity, resulting in mental relaxation and decreased autonomic arousal thereby, decreasing force fluctuations during isometric contraction. This is reflected as improvement in HGS and HGE.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Diagn Res Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Diagn Res Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia