Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of ventilators compatible with magnetic resonance imaging: a bench study.
Chikata, Yusuke; Okuda, Nao; Izawa, Masayo; Onodera, Mutsuo; Nishimura, Masaji.
Afiliação
  • Chikata Y; Medical Equipment Center, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
  • Okuda N; Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
  • Izawa M; Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
  • Onodera M; Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
  • Nishimura M; Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan. nmasaji@tokushima-u.ac.jp.
Respir Care ; 60(3): 341-6, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25492962
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indispensable for diagnosing brain and spinal cord abnormalities. Magnetic components cannot be used during MRI procedures; therefore, patient support equipment must use MRI-compatible materials. However, little is known of the performance of MRI-compatible ventilators.

METHODS:

At commonly used settings, we tested the delivered tidal volume (V(T)), F(IO2), PEEP, and operation of the high-inspiratory-pressure-relief valves of 4 portable MRI-compatible ventilators (Pneupac VR1, ParaPAC 200DMRI, CAREvent MRI, iVent201) and one ICU ventilator (Servo-i). Each ventilator was set in volume control/continuous mandatory ventilation mode. Breathing frequency and V(T) were tested at 10 breaths/min and 300, 500, and 700 mL, respectively. The Pneupac VR1 has fixed V(T) and frequency combinations, so it was tested at V(T) = 300 mL and 20 breaths/min, V(T) = 500 mL and 12 breaths/min, and V(T) = 800 mL and 10 breaths/min. F(IO2) was 0.6 and 1.0. At the air-mix setting, F(IO2) was fixed at 0.5 with the Pneupac VR1, 0.45 with the ParaPAC 200DMRI, and 0.6 with the CAREvent MRI. PEEP was set at 5 and 10 cm H2O, and pressure relief was set at 30 and 40 cm H2O.

RESULTS:

V(T) error varied widely among ventilators (-28.1 to 25.5%). As V(T) increased, error decreased with the Pneupac VR1, ParaPAC 200DMRI, and CAREvent MRI (P < .05). F(IO2) error ranged from -13.3 to 25.3% at 0.6 (or air mix). PEEP error varied among ventilators (-29.2 to 42.5%). Only the Servo-i maintained V(T), F(IO2), and PEEP at set levels. The pressure-relief valves worked in all ventilators.

CONCLUSIONS:

None of the MRI-compatible ventilators maintained V(T), F(IO2), and PEEP at set levels. Vital signs of patients with unstable respiratory mechanics should be monitored during transport and MRI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Teste de Materiais / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ventiladores Mecânicos / Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Teste de Materiais / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ventiladores Mecânicos / Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão