Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Quality of Life Early and Late After Kidney Transplantation.
Ay, Nurettin; Anil, Melih; Alp, Vahhac; Sevük, Utkan; Dinç, Bülent; Çelik, Mustafa; Danis, Ramazan.
Afiliação
  • Ay N; Department of General Surgery, Transplantation Center, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
  • Anil M; Department of Nephrology, Transplantation Center, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
  • Alp V; Department of General Surgery, Transplantation Center, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
  • Sevük U; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Transplantation Center, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
  • Dinç B; Department of General Surgery, Atatürk State Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Çelik M; Department of Psychiatry, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
  • Danis R; Department of Nephrology, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Ann Transplant ; 20: 493-9, 2015 Aug 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313218
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The most important purpose of transplantation is to improve quality of life (QOL) together with increasing life expectancy. The aim of this study was to compare the QOL of both donors and kidney transplant recipients and a control group at the 3rd and 9th postoperative months by using the SF36 health survey, to investigate the changes in this 6-month period and to evaluate descriptive data and satisfaction of patients and donors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-seven donors and 47 kidney transplant recipients who were operated on in Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital between August 2012 and March 2015 and had been followed up for at least 9 months and 47 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. RESULTS Physical functioning (PF) was higher at the 9th postoperative month compared to the 3rd month in the recipient group (p=0.028). Donors had higher PF (p=0.007) and functioning physical role (PR; p=0.01) compared to recipients. Recipients had lower PF (p=0.016), PR (p=0.004), and functional-emotional role (ER; p=0.03) at the 3rd month and had lower PR (p=0.002) at the 9th month postoperatively comparing to the control group. Donors had lower PF (p=0.007) and PR (p=0.01) at the 3rd month and had lower PR (p=0.035) at the 9th month postoperatively comparing to the control group. Donors and recipients had similar QOL at the 9th month. CONCLUSIONS During follow-up, we observed an increase in QOL (in some subgroups) at 9 months postoperatively. Donors and recipients had similar QOL (except for PR) with the control group at the 9th month. QOL was better in younger and male patients and educated persons. Donors did not show any regret regarding their donation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Transplante de Rim / Satisfação do Paciente / Doadores Vivos / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Transplante de Rim / Satisfação do Paciente / Doadores Vivos / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia