Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a Magnetic Attachment Method for Bionic Eye Applications.
Fox, Kate; Meffin, Hamish; Burns, Owen; Abbott, Carla J; Allen, Penelope J; Opie, Nicholas L; McGowan, Ceara; Yeoh, Jonathan; Ahnood, Arman; Luu, Chi D; Cicione, Rosemary; Saunders, Alexia L; McPhedran, Michelle; Cardamone, Lisa; Villalobos, Joel; Garrett, David J; Nayagam, David A X; Apollo, Nicholas V; Ganesan, Kumaravelu; Shivdasani, Mohit N; Stacey, Alastair; Escudie, Mathilde; Lichter, Samantha; Shepherd, Robert K; Prawer, Steven.
Afiliação
  • Fox K; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Meffin H; School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Burns O; Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Abbott CJ; National Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Allen PJ; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Opie NL; Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • McGowan C; Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Yeoh J; Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ahnood A; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Luu CD; Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cicione R; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Saunders AL; Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • McPhedran M; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cardamone L; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Villalobos J; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Garrett DJ; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nayagam DA; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Apollo NV; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ganesan K; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shivdasani MN; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Stacey A; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Escudie M; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lichter S; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shepherd RK; The Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Prawer S; School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Artif Organs ; 40(3): E12-24, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26416723
ABSTRACT
Successful visual prostheses require stable, long-term attachment. Epiretinal prostheses, in particular, require attachment methods to fix the prosthesis onto the retina. The most common method is fixation with a retinal tack; however, tacks cause retinal trauma, and surgical proficiency is important to ensure optimal placement of the prosthesis near the macula. Accordingly, alternate attachment methods are required. In this study, we detail a novel method of magnetic attachment for an epiretinal prosthesis using two prostheses components positioned on opposing sides of the retina. The magnetic attachment technique was piloted in a feline animal model (chronic, nonrecovery implantation). We also detail a new method to reliably control the magnet coupling force using heat. It was found that the force exerted upon the tissue that separates the two components could be minimized as the measured force is proportionately smaller at the working distance. We thus detail, for the first time, a surgical method using customized magnets to position and affix an epiretinal prosthesis on the retina. The position of the epiretinal prosthesis is reliable, and its location on the retina is accurately controlled by the placement of a secondary magnet in the suprachoroidal location. The electrode position above the retina is less than 50 microns at the center of the device, although there were pressure points seen at the two edges due to curvature misalignment. The degree of retinal compression found in this study was unacceptably high; nevertheless, the normal structure of the retina remained intact under the electrodes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Implantação de Prótese / Próteses Visuais / Imãs Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Implantação de Prótese / Próteses Visuais / Imãs Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália