Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary Care Providers' Initial Evaluation of Children with Global Developmental Delay: A Clinical Vignette Study.
Tarini, Beth A; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J; Saal, Howard M; Edmondson, Laurie; Uhlmann, Wendy R.
Afiliação
  • Tarini BA; Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: btarini@umich.edu.
  • Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Saal HM; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Edmondson L; Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Uhlmann WR; Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Pediatr ; 167(6): 1404-8.e1, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26477869
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the decisions of pediatric primary care physicians about their diagnostic evaluation for a child with suspected global developmental delay (GDD). STUDY

DESIGN:

A survey was mailed to a sample of pediatricians (n = 600) and family physicians (n = 600) randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The survey contained a clinical vignette describing a 9-month-old nondysmorphic boy with GDD. Participants were asked their initial evaluation steps (test, refer, or both test and refer) and what types of referral and/or testing they would pursue. We examined bivariate associations between physician/clinical practice characteristics and participants' evaluation decision.

RESULTS:

More pediatricians than family physicians completed the survey (response rates 55% vs 38%). Almost three-quarters of the respondents (74%) reported that their first step in a diagnostic evaluation would be to refer the child without testing, 22% would test only, and 4% would both test and refer. As their initial step, most physicians referred to a developmental pediatrician (58%), and only 5% would refer to a geneticist. The most commonly ordered test was general biochemical testing (64%). The most commonly ordered genetic test was a karyotype (39%).

CONCLUSIONS:

When evaluating a child with GDD, few primary care physicians would order genetic testing or refer to a genetics specialist as a first evaluation step. Future studies should examine both barriers to and utilization of a genetic evaluation for children with GDD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Atenção Primária à Saúde / Padrões de Prática Médica / Diagnóstico por Imagem / Deficiências do Desenvolvimento / Testes Genéticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Atenção Primária à Saúde / Padrões de Prática Médica / Diagnóstico por Imagem / Deficiências do Desenvolvimento / Testes Genéticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article