Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early Changes in Kidney Distribution under the New Allocation System.
Massie, Allan B; Luo, Xun; Lonze, Bonnie E; Desai, Niraj M; Bingaman, Adam W; Cooper, Matthew; Segev, Dorry L.
Afiliação
  • Massie AB; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Luo X; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Lonze BE; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Desai NM; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Bingaman AW; Texas Transplant Institute, Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital, San Antonio, Texas;
  • Cooper M; Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; and.
  • Segev DL; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota dorry@jhmi.edu.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 27(8): 2495-501, 2016 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26677865
ABSTRACT
The Kidney Allocation System (KAS), a major change to deceased donor kidney allocation, was implemented in December 2014. Goals of KAS included directing the highest-quality organs to younger/healthier recipients and increasing access to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) for highly sensitized patients and racial/ethnic minorities. Using national registry data, we compared kidney distribution, DDKT rates for waitlist registrants, and recipient characteristics between January 1, 2013, and December 3, 2014 (pre-KAS) with those between December 4, 2014, and August 31, 2015 (post-KAS). Regional imports increased from 8.8% pre-KAS to 12.5% post-KAS; national imports increased from 12.7% pre-KAS to 19.1% post-KAS (P<0.001). The proportion of recipients >30 years older than their donor decreased from 19.4% to 15.0% (P<0.001). The proportion of recipients with calculated panel-reactive antibody =100 increased from 1.0% to 10.3% (P<0.001). Overall DDKT rate did not change as modeled using exponential regression adjusting for candidate characteristics (P=0.07). However, DDKT rate (incidence rate ratio, 95% confidence interval) increased for black (1.19; 1.13 to 1.25) and Hispanic (1.13; 1.05 to 1.20) candidates and for candidates aged 18-40 (1.47; 1.38 to 1.57), but declined for candidates aged >50 (0.93; 0.87 to 0.98 for aged 51-60 and 0.90; 0.85 to 0.96 for aged >70). Delayed graft function in transplant recipients increased from 24.8% pre-KAS to 29.9% post-KAS (P<0.001). Thus, in the first 9 months under KAS, access to DDKT improved for minorities, younger candidates, and highly sensitized patients, but declined for older candidates. Delayed graft function increased substantially, possibly suggesting poorer long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article