Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Novel Method for Quantifying the Inhaled Dose of Air Pollutants Based on Heart Rate, Breathing Rate and Forced Vital Capacity.
Greenwald, Roby; Hayat, Matthew J; Barton, Jerusha; Lopukhin, Anastasia.
Afiliação
  • Greenwald R; Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Hayat MJ; Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Barton J; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Lopukhin A; Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0147578, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809066
To better understand the interaction of physical activity and air pollution exposure, it is important to quantify the change in ventilation rate incurred by activity. In this paper, we describe a method for estimating ventilation using easily-measured variables such as heart rate (HR), breathing rate (fB), and forced vital capacity (FVC). We recruited healthy adolescents to use a treadmill while we continuously measured HR, fB, and the tidal volume (VT) of each breath. Participants began at rest then walked and ran at increasing speed until HR was 160-180 beats per minute followed by a cool down period. The novel feature of this method is that minute ventilation ([Formula: see text]) was normalized by FVC. We used general linear mixed models with a random effect for subject and identified nine potential predictor variables that influence either [Formula: see text] or FVC. We assessed predictive performance with a five-fold cross-validation procedure. We used a brute force selection process to identify the best performing models based on cross-validation percent error, the Akaike Information Criterion and the p-value of parameter estimates. We found a two-predictor model including HR and fB to have the best predictive performance ([Formula: see text]/FVC = -4.247+0.0595HR+0.226fB, mean percent error = 8.1±29%); however, given the ubiquity of HR measurements, a one-predictor model including HR may also be useful ([Formula: see text]/FVC = -3.859+0.101HR, mean percent error = 11.3±36%).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Atmosféricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Atmosféricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos