Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study.
Altman, Daniel; Mikkola, Tomi S; Bek, Karl Möller; Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi; Gunnarsson, Jonas; Engh, Marie Ellström; Falconer, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Altman D; Stockholm Urogynecological Clinic, Kommendörsgatan 5, 114 48, Stockholm, Sweden. daniel.altman@ki.se.
  • Mikkola TS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden. daniel.altman@ki.se.
  • Bek KM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Rahkola-Soisalo P; Folkhälsan Research center, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Gunnarsson J; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Engh ME; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Falconer C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Int Urogynecol J ; 27(9): 1337-45, 2016 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874525
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess safety and clinical outcomes in women operated on using the Uphold™ Lite Vaginal Support System. METHODS: We carried out a 1-year, multicenter, prospective, single cohort study of 207 women with symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage ≥2 apical pelvic organ prolapse, with or without concomitant anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Safety data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Anatomical outcome was assessed by the POP-Q and subjective outcomes by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory after 2 months and 1 year using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The overall rate of serious complications was 4.3 % (9 out of 207 patients), including 3 patients with bladder perforations, 1 with bleeding >1,000 ml, 2 who had undergone re-operations with complete mesh removal because of pain, and 3 surgical interventions during follow-up because of mesh exposure. POP-Q stage ≤1 after 1 year was 94 % and subjective symptom relief was reported by 91 % of patients (p < 0.001). Pain after 2 months and 1 year was 60 % lower compared with the preoperative mean (p < 0.001). Minor complications occurred in 20 women (9.7 %) and were dominated by lower urinary tract dysfunction. No predisposing risk factors for complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: The Uphold™ Lite procedure in women with apical pelvic organ prolapse provided satisfactory restoration of vaginal topography and symptom relief. However, serious complication rates were largely comparable with those of other transvaginal mesh kits.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Telas Cirúrgicas / Implantação de Prótese / Slings Suburetrais / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Telas Cirúrgicas / Implantação de Prótese / Slings Suburetrais / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia