Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized clinical trial comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc each with tenofovir plus emtricitabine for post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection.
Leal, Lorna; León, Agathe; Torres, Berta; Inciarte, Alexy; Lucero, Constanza; Mallolas, Josep; Laguno, Montserrat; Martínez-Rebollar, María; González-Cordón, Ana; Manzardo, Christian; Rojas, Jhon; Pich, Judit; Arnaiz, Joan A; Gatell, Josep M; García, Felipe.
Afiliação
  • Leal L; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • León A; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Torres B; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Inciarte A; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Lucero C; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mallolas J; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Laguno M; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez-Rebollar M; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • González-Cordón A; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Manzardo C; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rojas J; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pich J; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Arnaiz JA; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gatell JM; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • García F; Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain fgarcia@clinic.ub.es.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(7): 1982-6, 2016 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994091
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study was to assess post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc, both with tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine as the backbone.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, open, randomized clinical trial. Individuals attending the emergency room because of potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for receiving PEP were randomized to one of two groups tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) once daily plus either ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (400/100 mg) or maraviroc (300 mg) twice daily. Five follow-up visits were scheduled for days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse events and rate of seroconversions. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01533272.

RESULTS:

One-hundred-and-seventeen individuals were randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 120 to maraviroc (n = 237). PEP non-completion at day 28 was 38% (n = 89), with significant differences between arms [ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 44% (n = 51) versus maraviroc 32% (n = 38), P = 0.05]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1 (n = 182). PEP non-completion in this subgroup was also significantly higher in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (27% versus 13%, P = 0.004). The proportion of patients with low adherence was similar between arms (52% versus 47%, P = 0.56). Adverse events were reported by 111 patients and were significantly more common in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (72% versus 51%, P = 0.003). No seroconversions were observed during the study.

CONCLUSIONS:

PEP non-completion and adverse events were both significantly higher in patients allocated to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. These data suggest that maraviroc is a well-tolerated antiretroviral that can be used in this setting.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Quimioprevenção / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Adesão à Medicação / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Quimioprevenção / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Adesão à Medicação / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha