Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
Tschauner, Sebastian; Marterer, Robert; Nagy, Eszter; Apfaltrer, Georg; Riccabona, Michael; Singer, Georg; Stücklschweiger, Georg; Guss, Helmuth; Sorantin, Erich.
Afiliação
  • Tschauner S; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Marterer R; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Nagy E; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Apfaltrer G; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Riccabona M; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Singer G; Division of General Pediatric and Adolescence Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Stücklschweiger G; Competence Centre for Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Guss H; Competence Centre for Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Sorantin E; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0178747, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28570626
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate and compare surface doses of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) device in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.

METHODS:

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to measure and compare surface doses between CBCT and MDCT in a left ankle and a right wrist pediatric phantom. In both modalities adapted pediatric dose protocols were utilized to achieve realistic imaging conditions. All measurements were repeated three times to prove test-retest reliability. Additionally, objective and subjective image quality parameters were assessed.

RESULTS:

Average surface doses were 3.8 ±2.1 mGy for the ankle, and 2.2 ±1.3 mGy for the wrist in CBCT. The corresponding surface doses in optimized MDCT were 4.5 ±1.3 mGy for the ankle, and 3.4 ±0.7 mGy for the wrist. Overall, mean surface dose was significantly lower in CBCT (3.0 ±1.9 mGy vs. 3.9 ±1.2 mGy, p<0.001). Subjectively rated general image quality was not significantly different between the study protocols (p = 0.421), whereas objectively measured image quality parameters were in favor of CBCT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Adapted extremity CBCT imaging protocols have the potential to fall below optimized pediatric ankle and wrist MDCT doses at comparable image qualities. These possible dose savings warrant further development and research in pediatric extremity CBCT applications.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Punho / Imagens de Fantasmas / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Tornozelo Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Punho / Imagens de Fantasmas / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Tornozelo Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria