Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electronic visual analogue scales for pain, fatigue, anxiety and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis using smartphone and tablet: a reliability and feasibility study.
Kos, D; Raeymaekers, J; Van Remoortel, A; D'hooghe, M B; Nagels, G; D'Haeseleer, M; Peeters, E; Dams, T; Peeters, T.
Afiliação
  • Kos D; 1 KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Raeymaekers J; 2 AP University College Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Van Remoortel A; 3 Pain in Motion Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
  • D'hooghe MB; 1 KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Nagels G; 4 Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium.
  • D'Haeseleer M; 5 National MS Center Melsbroek, Department of Neurology, Belgium.
  • Peeters E; 5 National MS Center Melsbroek, Department of Neurology, Belgium.
  • Dams T; 6 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center for Neurosciences, Belgium.
  • Peeters T; 5 National MS Center Melsbroek, Department of Neurology, Belgium.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(9): 1215-1225, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786335
OBJECTIVE: To explore the reliability and feasibility of electronic visual analogue scales in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy individuals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study Setting: Clinical setting Subjects: Convenience sample of 52 people with MS and 52 matched healthy controls Interventions: NA Main measures: Participants scored 15 statements assessing fatigue, pain, anxiety and quality of life on an electronic visual analogue scale (eVAS), either using a smartphone or a tablet (randomly allocated). To check for test-retest reliability, statements were administered in two separate randomly ordered groups. Subjects completed a feasibility questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean (SD) eVAS scores ranged from 35 (28.1) to 80 (22.1) in MS group, and from 57 (28.0) to 86 (13.2) in controls. Intra Class Correlations ranged from 0.73 to 0.95 in MS sample; 0.61 to 0.92 in controls. For most statements, Bland-Altman plots indicated no systematic error, but relatively large random error of the eVAS scores (exceeding 20mm). Considerable ceiling effects (i.e. better health) were found in healthy controls. Similar reliability was found among smartphone or tablet, different demographic groups and the experience-groups. CONCLUSION: Electronic visual analogue scales are reliable and useful for people with MS to register fatigue, pain, anxiety and quality of life.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Ansiedade / Dor / Qualidade de Vida / Fadiga / Escala Visual Analógica / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Ansiedade / Dor / Qualidade de Vida / Fadiga / Escala Visual Analógica / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica