Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Couples' experiences with continuous positive airway pressure treatment: a dyadic perspective.
Ye, Lichuan; Antonelli, Mary T; Willis, Danny G; Kayser, Karen; Malhotra, Atul; Patel, Sanjay R.
Afiliação
  • Ye L; Bouvé College of Health Sciences School of Nursing, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: l.ye@northeastern.edu.
  • Antonelli MT; William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
  • Willis DG; University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Kayser K; Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Malhotra A; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Patel SR; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sleep Health ; 3(5): 362-367, 2017 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28923193
OBJECTIVE: The majority of adults sleep with a partner, making sleep a dyadic experience. However, interventions to improve sleep have primarily focused on individuals. This qualitative analysis used a dyadic approach to identify facilitators and barriers to successful treatment of one of the most common sleep disorders, obstructive sleep apnea, with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: Twenty joint qualitative interviews were conducted with couples, one couple at a time, with a sample of 20 patients with obstructive sleep apnea and their partners to develop an understanding of couples' experiences with CPAP use. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the interview data. RESULTS: Facilitators of CPAP use were the following: the partner aiding diagnosis and treatment, couples working together using CPAP, the perceived benefits of CPAP for both partners, the patient being motivated to use CPAP for the benefit of the partner, and various types of support provided by the partner to encourage CPAP use. Major barriers to CPAP use were the following: anxiety related to CPAP use particularly in the beginning of therapy, bothersome equipment causing disruptions in sleep and bedtime routine, interruptions to intimacy, and concern about image change while wearing CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that couple-directed interventions that advocate for a mutually engaging perspective and promote supportive relationships and positive dyadic coping may be targets for improving CPAP adherence. Further research evaluating the potential of couple-focused interventions to improve sleep health is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cônjuges / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas / Relações Interpessoais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Health Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cônjuges / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas / Relações Interpessoais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Health Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article