Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Zone II Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Fingers: A Cadaveric Study.
Kazmers, Nikolas H; Gordon, Joshua A; Buterbaugh, Kristen L; Bozentka, David J; Steinberg, David R; Khoury, Viviane.
Afiliação
  • Kazmers NH; Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Gordon JA; Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Buterbaugh KL; Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Bozentka DJ; Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Steinberg DR; Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Khoury V; Departments of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Ultrasound Med ; 37(4): 941-948, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960382
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Accurate assessment of zone II partial flexor tendon lacerations in the finger is clinically important. Surgical repair is recommended for lacerations of greater than 50% to 60%. Our goal was to evaluate ultrasonographic test characteristics and accuracy in identifying partial flexor tendon lacerations in a cadaveric model.

METHODS:

From fresh-frozen above-elbow human cadaveric specimens, 32 flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomly selected to remain intact or receive low- or high-grade lacerations involving 10% to 40% and 60% to 90% of the radioulnar width within Verdan Zone II, respectively. Static and dynamic ultrasonography using a linear array 14-MHz transducer was performed by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. Sensitivities, specificities, and other standard test performance metrics were calculated. Actual and measured percentages of tendon laceration were compared by the paired t test.

RESULTS:

After randomization, 24 tendons were lacerated (12 low- and 12 high-grade), whereas 8 remained intact. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence versus absence of a partial laceration were 0.54 and 0.75, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratio values of 2.17 and 0.61. For low-grade lacerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.25 and 0.85, compared to 0.83 and 0.85 for high-grade lacerations. Ultrasonography underestimated the percentage of tendon involvement by a mean of 18.1% for the study population as a whole (95% confidence interval, 9.0% to 27.2%; P < .001) but accurately determined the extent for correctly diagnosed high-grade lacerations (-6.7%; 95% confidence interval, -18.7% to 5.2%; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS:

Ultrasonography was useful in identifying and characterizing clinically relevant high-grade zone II partial flexor digitorum profundus lacerations in a cadaveric model.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos dos Tendões / Ultrassonografia / Lacerações / Traumatismos dos Dedos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos dos Tendões / Ultrassonografia / Lacerações / Traumatismos dos Dedos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos