Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers.
Bornstein, Marta; Carter, Marion; Zapata, Lauren; Gavin, Loretta; Moskosky, Susan.
Afiliação
  • Bornstein M; Oak Ridge Institute for Research and Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: Martabornstein@gmail.com.
  • Carter M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Zapata L; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, GA.
  • Gavin L; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs, Washington DC.
  • Moskosky S; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs, Washington DC.
Contraception ; 97(5): 405-410, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29253581
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Access to a full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), is central to providing quality family planning services. We describe health center-related factors associated with LARC availability, including staff training in LARC insertion/removal and approaches to offering LARC, whether onsite or through referral. STUDY

DESIGN:

We analyzed nationally representative survey data collected during 2013-2014 from administrators of publicly funded U.S. health centers that offered family planning. The response rate was 49.3% (n=1615). In addition to descriptive statistics, we used multivariable logistic regression to identify health center characteristics associated with offering both IUDs and implants onsite.

RESULTS:

Two-thirds (64%) of health centers had staff trained in all three LARC types (hormonal IUD, copper IUD, implant); 21% had no staff trained in any of those contraceptive methods. Half of health centers (52%) offered IUDs (any type) and implants onsite. After onsite provision, informal referral arrangements were the most common way LARC methods were offered. In adjusted analyses, Planned Parenthood (AOR=9.49) and hospital-based (AOR=2.35) health centers had increased odds of offering IUDs (any type) and implants onsite, compared to Health Departments, as did Title X-funded (AOR=1.55) compared to non-Title X-funded health centers and centers serving a larger volume of family planning clients. Centers serving mostly rural areas compared to those serving urbans areas had lower odds (AOR 0.60) of offering IUD (any type) and implants.

CONCLUSIONS:

Variation in LARC access remains among publicly funded health centers. In particular, Health Departments and rural health centers have relatively low LARC provision. IMPLICATIONS For more women to be offered a full range of contraceptive methods, additional efforts should be made to increase availability of LARC in publicly-funded health centers, such as addressing provider training gaps, improving referrals mechanisms, and other efforts to strengthen the health care system.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros Comunitários de Saúde / Serviços de Planejamento Familiar / Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros Comunitários de Saúde / Serviços de Planejamento Familiar / Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article