Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sham Feeding with Bacon Does Not Alter Transit Time or Complete Examination Rate During Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.
Prichard, David; Ou, George; Galorport, Cherry; Enns, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Prichard D; Mayo Clinic Health System Franciscan Healthcare in La Crosse, 700 West Avenue South, La Crosse, WI, 54601, USA. prichard.david@mayo.edu.
  • Ou G; St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. prichard.david@mayo.edu.
  • Galorport C; St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Enns R; St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dig Dis Sci ; 63(2): 422-428, 2018 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302875
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

During capsule endoscopy (CE) studies, the complete examination rate (CER) can be increased by prolonging capsule battery life or reducing gastric transit time (GTT) and/or small bowel transit time (SBTT). However, despite enhanced battery life, 10% of studies remain incomplete. Previously studied interventions to reduce SBTT and enhance CER have produced conflicting results. We hypothesize that this may be a consequence of an insufficiently potent stimulus of small bowel motility.

AIMS:

To examine whether potent stimulation of the cephalic response of digestion during small bowel CE reduces GTT and/or SBTT and thus increases the CER.

METHODS:

A single-blind randomized trial was performed to evaluate the effect of bacon sham feeding on GTT, SBTT and CER.

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics were similar between 63 sham fed patients and 59 controls. The median GTT was 17 min (9-65) in the bacon group and 25 min (14-55) in the control group. The median SBTT was 199 min (119-316) and 222 min (151-287), respectively. Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated no significant difference between groups for GTT (rate ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.71-1.51, P = 0.87) or SBTT (rate ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.70-1.49, P = 0.93). Although the taste of bacon was considered favorably by 72% of participants, taste did not correlate with GTT (ρ = 0.03, P = 0.83) or SBTT (ρ = - 0.115, P = 0.33). The CER was 91 and 95% in the bacon and control groups, respectively (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION:

Bacon sham feeding has no effect on GTT, SBTT or CER and cannot be recommended in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trânsito Gastrointestinal / Endoscopia por Cápsula / Produtos da Carne Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trânsito Gastrointestinal / Endoscopia por Cápsula / Produtos da Carne Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos