Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging.
Castro-Poças, Fernando; Dinis-Ribeiro, Mário; Rocha, Anabela; Araújo, Tarcísio; Pedroto, Isabel.
Afiliação
  • Castro-Poças F; Department of Gastroenterology, ManoPh-CUF Institute , Portugal.
  • Dinis-Ribeiro M; CIDES/CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Rocha A; Service of General Surgery, Santo António Hospital.
  • Araújo T; Gastrenterologia, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Portugal.
  • Pedroto I; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(5): 306-310, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29320861
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

rectal cancer staging using rigid probes or echoendoscopes has some limitations. The aim of the study was to compare rectal cancer preoperative staging using conventional endoluminal ultrasonography with three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and miniprobes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

sixty patients were included and evaluated with a) a conventional echoendoscope (7.5 and 12 MHz); b) miniprobes (12 MHz); and c) the Easy 3D Freescan software for three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography. The reference or gold standard was conventional endoluminal ultrasonography in all cases and pathological assessment for those without preoperative therapy. The differences in T and N staging accuracy in both longitudinal and circumferential extension were evaluated.

RESULTS:

with regard to T staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 85% (compared to pathological analysis), and the agreement between miniprobes vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (kappa = 0.81) and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.87) was significant. In addition, miniprobes had an accuracy of 82% and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had a higher accuracy (96%). With regard to N staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 91% with a sensitivity of 78%. However, the agreement between miniprobes and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.70) was lower. Interestingly, miniprobes had a lower accuracy of 81% whereas three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had an accuracy of 100% without any false negative. No false positives were observed in any of the techniques. Accuracy for T and N staging was not influenced by longitudinal or circumferential extensions of the tumor in all types of endoscopic ultrasonography analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS:

miniprobes and especially three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography may be relevant during rectal cancer staging.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Cuidados Pré-Operatórios / Endossonografia / Imageamento Tridimensional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Cuidados Pré-Operatórios / Endossonografia / Imageamento Tridimensional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal