Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of the Open-Label Lead-In Period of Two Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trials Evaluating Dapagliflozin, Saxagliptin, and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes.
Mathieu, Chantal; Catrinoiu, Doina; Ranetti, Aurelian Emil; Johnsson, Eva; Hansen, Lars; Chen, Hungta; Garcia-Sanchez, Ricardo; Iqbal, Nayyar; Celiñski, Aleksander.
Afiliação
  • Mathieu C; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. chantal.mathieu@uzleuven.be.
  • Catrinoiu D; Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Constanta, Constanta, Romania.
  • Ranetti AE; Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Johnsson E; AstraZeneca Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
  • Hansen L; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Chen H; AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Garcia-Sanchez R; AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Iqbal N; AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Celiñski A; CenterMed-Centrum Badan Klinicznych, Kraków, Poland.
Diabetes Ther ; 9(4): 1703-1711, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802530
INTRODUCTION: To examine the utility of sequential versus dual add-on approaches in patients who have type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control with metformin therapy alone, we characterized the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with dapagliflozin or saxagliptin added to metformin in the open-label lead-in periods of two phase 3 trials (study 1, NCT01619059; study 2, NCT01646320) that evaluated triple therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: During the lead-in periods of each trial, patients [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.0-11.5%] who had been receiving metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day for ≥ 8 weeks received metformin immediate release at an equivalent dose plus dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (study 1; N = 482) or saxagliptin 5 mg/day (study 2; N = 349) for 16 weeks. Efficacy end points were assessed at week - 2 before randomization. RESULTS: Mean change in HbA1c [95% confidence interval (CI)] from lead-in baseline (study 1, 9.3%; study 2, 9.4%) was - 1.6% (- 1.7, - 1.5) in study 1 and - 1.3% (- 1.5, - 1.2) in study 2. Mean changes (95% CI) from lead-in baseline in weight and fasting plasma glucose were - 2.4 kg (- 2.6, - 2.1) and - 47.5 mg/dL (- 52.8, - 42.3) for study 1 and - 0.5 kg (- 0.8, - 0.2) and - 28.5 mg/dL (- 35.8, - 21.2) for study 2. At the end of the lead-in period, 22.0% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0% in study 1 and 17.5% in study 2. Dual therapy was well tolerated, with hypoglycemia incidence < 1% in both studies. CONCLUSION: Dual therapy improved glycemic control and was well tolerated; however, most patients required additional therapy to further improve HbA1c towards target, suggesting that an early move to triple therapy with oral glucose-lowering drugs rather than a stepwise approach may be beneficial for patients with high HbA1c levels on metformin therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01619059, NCT01646320. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica