Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.
Dykewicz, Mark S; Rodrigues, Jonathan M; Slavin, Raymond G.
Afiliação
  • Dykewicz MS; Section of Allergy and Immunology, Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo. Electronic address: Mark.dykewicz@health.slu.edu.
  • Rodrigues JM; Allergy and Immunology, Sanford Health, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bismarck, ND.
  • Slavin RG; Section of Allergy and Immunology, Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 142(2): 341-351, 2018 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080526
ABSTRACT
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subset of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) characterized by antifungal IgE sensitivity, eosinophil-rich mucus (ie, allergic mucin), and characteristic computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in paranasal sinuses. AFRS develops in immunocompetent patients, with occurrence influenced by climate, geography, and several identified host factors. Molecular pathways and immune responses driving AFRS are still being delineated, but prominent adaptive and more recently recognized innate type 2 immune responses are important, many similar to those established in patients with other forms of CRSwNP. It is unclear whether AFRS represents merely a more extreme expression of pathways important in patients with CRSwNP or whether there are other disordered immune responses that would define a distinct endotype or endotypes. Although AFRS and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis share some analogous immune mechanisms, the 2 conditions do not occur commonly in the same patient. Treatment of AFRS almost always requires surgical debridement of the involved sinuses. Oral corticosteroids decrease recurrence after surgery, but other adjunctive pharmacologic agents, including topical and oral antifungal agents, do not have a firm evidence basis for use. There is good rationale for use of biologic agents that target eosinophilic inflammation or other type 2 responses, but studies in patients with AFRS are required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Sinusite / Pólipos Nasais / Eosinófilos / Rinite Alérgica / Micoses Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Sinusite / Pólipos Nasais / Eosinófilos / Rinite Alérgica / Micoses Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article