Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discriminative ability and clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) in identifying falls risk in people with multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study.
Quinn, Gillian; Comber, Laura; McGuigan, Chris; Galvin, Rose; Coote, Susan.
Afiliação
  • Quinn G; 1 School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Comber L; 2 St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • McGuigan C; 1 School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Galvin R; 2 St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Coote S; 1 School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Clin Rehabil ; 33(2): 317-326, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103642
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate discriminative ability and clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go under single- and dual-task conditions between fallers and non-fallers in multiple sclerosis (MS).

DESIGN:

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Neurology service in a tertiary hospital.

SUBJECTS:

Participants were 101 people with MS and Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3-6.5. One participant withdrew after the baseline assessment, and hence the data were analysed for 100 participants.

INTERVENTIONS:

No specific intervention. MAIN

MEASURES:

Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive. Three-month prospective diaries recorded falls.

RESULTS:

Mean age was 52.6 (SD 10.7) and 66 were female. Majority of the participants had progressive MS (72) and 73 used a walking aid; 56 participants recorded 791 falls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive in distinguishing fallers (person with ⩾1 fall) from non-fallers are 0.60 and 0.57, respectively, and in distinguishing multiple fallers (⩾2 falls) the values are 0.46 and 0.43. A Timed Up and Go score of ⩾9 seconds has a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.34 to identify fallers and a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.27 to identify multiple fallers. A Timed Up and Go-Cognitive score of ⩾11 seconds has a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.30 to identify fallers and a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.26 to identify multiple fallers.

CONCLUSION:

The Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive do not demonstrate sufficient clinical utility or discriminative ability for assessing falls risk in MS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidentes por Quedas / Cognição / Atividade Motora / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidentes por Quedas / Cognição / Atividade Motora / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda