Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Timing matters: Impact of anticonvulsant drug treatment and spikes on seizure risk in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.
Xie, Wenting; Ross, Erin E; Kramer, Mark A; Eden, Uri T; Chu, Catherine J.
Afiliação
  • Xie W; Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
  • Ross EE; Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
  • Kramer MA; Department of Mathematics and Statistics Boston University Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
  • Eden UT; Department of Mathematics and Statistics Boston University Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
  • Chu CJ; Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
Epilepsia Open ; 3(3): 409-417, 2018 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30187012
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) is a common, self-limited epilepsy syndrome affecting school-age children. Classic interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) confirm diagnosis, and BECTS is presumed to be pharmacoresponsive. As seizure risk decreases in time with this disease, we hypothesize that the impact of IEDs and anticonvulsive drug (ACD) treatment on the risk of subsequent seizure will differ based on disease duration.

METHODS:

We calculate subsequent seizure risk following diagnosis in a large retrospective cohort of children with BECTS (n = 130), evaluating the impact of IEDs and ACD treatment in the first, second, third, and fourth years of disease. We use a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression models. Patients were censored if they were lost to follow-up or if they changed group status.

RESULTS:

Two-thirds of children had a subsequent seizure within 2 years of diagnosis. The majority of children had a subsequent seizure within 3 years despite treatment. The presence of IEDs on electroencephalography (EEG) did not impact subsequent seizure risk early in the disease. By the fourth year of disease, all children without IEDs remained seizure free, whereas one-third of children with IEDs at this stage had a subsequent seizure. Conversely, ACD treatment corresponded with lower risk of seizure early in the disease but did not impact seizure risk in later years.

SIGNIFICANCE:

In this cohort, the majority of children with BECTS had a subsequent seizure despite treatment. In addition, ACD treatment and IEDs predicted seizure risk at specific points of disease duration. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these exploratory findings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Open Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Open Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article